AMY LEE WAI YEE NORBERT FERNANDEZ
Applying the paramountcy of the children's welfare, the court accepted the children’s expressed unanimous wish to remain together and reside at the family home with their father, accepted the independent government specialist's finding that KLF does not meet ASD criteria, found insufficient evidence of abuse, and concluded that joint guardianship with physical care and control vested in the Respondent best serves the children's welfare; financial responsibility is shared and Applicant ordered to contribute RM500 per child per month plus equal sharing of education and medical costs and past therapy costs of RM43,902 to be borne equally.
- Citation
- BA-24F-169-07/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Applicant Wife: Amy Lee Wai Yee; Respondent Husband: Norbert Fernandez
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 5 June 2025
- Case Number
- BA-24F-169-07/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Guardianship, Custody, Access and Maintenance Application Under Guardianship of Infants Act 1961 and Law Reform (marriage & Divorce) Act 1976 / Trial Court Judgment on Interim Custody and Maintenance; Appeal Lodged
- Outcome
- Court ordered joint guardianship and custody; physical care and control vested in Respondent; access to Applicant; maintenance and cost-sharing orders made; parties to bear their own costs
- Legal Topics
- Best Interests of the Child, Joint Guardianship, Physical Care and Control, Child Interviews and Wishes, Child Disability Assessment, Sibling Unity, Parental Financial Contribution
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amy Lee Wai Yee
Applicant Wife
Norbert Fernandez
Respondent Husband
Procedural Posture
Guardianship, Custody, Access and Maintenance Application Under Guardianship of Infants Act 1961 and Law Reform (marriage & Divorce) Act 1976 / Trial Court Judgment on Interim Custody and Maintenance; Appeal Lodged
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sole guardianship, custody, care and control should be granted to Applicant or Respondent
- 2 Whether KLF has Autism Spectrum Disorder and relevance to custody
- 3 Whether the children should be kept together or separated between parents
Ratio Decidendi
Applying the paramountcy of the children's welfare, the court accepted the children’s expressed unanimous wish to remain together and reside at the family home with their father, accepted the independent government specialist's finding that KLF does not meet ASD criteria, found insufficient evidence of abuse, and concluded that joint guardianship with physical care and control vested in the Respondent best serves the children's welfare; financial responsibility is shared and Applicant ordered to contribute RM500 per child per month plus equal sharing of education and medical costs and past therapy costs of RM43,902 to be borne equally.
Court Disposition
Court ordered joint guardianship and custody; physical care and control vested in Respondent; access to Applicant; maintenance and cost-sharing orders made; parties to bear their own costs
Orders
- Guardianship and custody of all four children to be jointly shared by Applicant and Defendant
- Physical care and control of the children vested in the Defendant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment