CHEONG GEEANG SEONG TUNE INSURANCE MALAYSIA BERHAD
The defendant breached the express confidentiality clause by disclosing client-specific confidential information to competitors, that disclosure caused the non-renewal of two long-standing clients' policies with resultant lost premiums, and the trial judge's factual findings on those points were properly supported...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- WA-12BNCVC-49-05/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Cheong Geeang Seong; Respondent/plaintiff: Tune Insurance Malaysia Berhad
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 15 January 2020
- Case Number
- WA-12BNCVC-49-05/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (appeal From Sessions Court) / High Court Judgment (appeal Dismissed)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; decision of the Sessions Court affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Employment Contract, Misuse/disclosure of Confidential Information, Conflict of Interest, Causation Between Breach and Loss, Assessment of Damages, Appellate Review of Factual Findings
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cheong Geeang Seong
Appellant/defendant
Tune Insurance Malaysia Berhad
Respondent/plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (appeal From Sessions Court) / High Court Judgment (appeal Dismissed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant breached the express confidentiality term of his employment contract by disclosing client information to competitors
- 2 Whether the disclosed information was legally confidential/trade secret
- 3 Whether the defendant's disclosure caused the non-renewal of the two insurance policies (causation) and quantifiable loss
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant breached the express confidentiality clause by disclosing client-specific confidential information to competitors, that disclosure caused the non-renewal of two long-standing clients' policies with resultant lost premiums, and the trial judge's factual findings on those points were properly supported by the evidence and should not be disturbed; damages of RM286,926 for lost premiums are reasonable and the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; decision of the Sessions Court affirmed.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs of RM3,000.00
- Decision of the Sessions Court affirmed (judgment dated 30 May 2020)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment