ASMA BINTI AHMAD SHARIFF TIARA MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
Section 59(1)(a) and (i) of the Strata Management Act 2013 do not, on their proper construction, impose a standalone statutory duty on a management corporation to establish or maintain a system of safety and security for residents; implementation of such measures is effected by by-laws or collective decisions (eg special resolution); plaintiff failed to prove breach or control necessary for res ipsa loquitur and failed to prove quantum; appeal dismissed.
- Citation
- BA-12B-139-12/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant/plaintiff: Asma Binti Ahmad Shariff; Respondent/defendant: Tiara Management Corporation
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 2025
- Case Number
- BA-12B-139-12/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (re Hearing) / High Court Appeal From Sessions Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Sessions Court dismissal of plaintiff's claim upheld; plaintiff ordered to pay costs
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Statutory Duty, Duty of Care, Res Ipsa Loquitur, Contributory Negligence, Non Delegable Duty, Assessment of Damages
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Asma Binti Ahmad Shariff
Appellant/plaintiff
Tiara Management Corporation
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (re Hearing) / High Court Appeal From Sessions Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether management corporation owed statutory duty under Strata Management Act 2013 s59(1)(a) and (i) to provide and maintain a security system for residents
- 2 Whether defendant breached any statutory or common law duty of care
- 3 Whether res ipsa loquitur applies to infer negligence
Ratio Decidendi
Section 59(1)(a) and (i) of the Strata Management Act 2013 do not, on their proper construction, impose a standalone statutory duty on a management corporation to establish or maintain a system of safety and security for residents; implementation of such measures is effected by by-laws or collective decisions (eg special resolution); plaintiff failed to prove breach or control necessary for res ipsa loquitur and failed to prove quantum; appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Sessions Court dismissal of plaintiff's claim upheld; plaintiff ordered to pay costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Plaintiff ordered to pay costs to Defendant in the sum of RM10000.00
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment