1. ) BA-24C-5-03/2021 INTEGRAL ACRES SDN. BHD. (Co. No.: 672818-M) 2. ) BA-24C-7-03/2021 BCEG INTERNATIONAL (M) SDN. BHD. (Co. No.: 96600729-U) 3. ) BA-24C-10-04/2021 INTEGRAL ACRES SDN. BHD. (Co. No.: 672818-M) 1. ) BCEG INTERNATIONAL (M)
The court held the adjudicator had jurisdiction to decide unpaid certified works and to award interest thereon, but exceeded jurisdiction under CIPAA by adjudicating Loss (EOT) and costs relating to BCEG's disputes with subcontractors (these are not "payment" under s4 and no written extension under s27(2) existed); the adjudicator also lacked power to award costs/fees of the previous adjudication after the prior adjudicator resigned; the court refused to set aside the valid parts and granted partial enforcement of the adjudication (specified sums and costs of this adjudication) and dismissed applications to set aside and to stay enforcement.
- Citation
- BA-24C-5-03/2021, BA-24C-7-03/2021 & BA-24C-10-04/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff/defendant (cross Applications): Integral Acres Sdn. Bhd.; Defendant/plaintiff (cross Applications): BCEG International (M) Sdn. Bhd.
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 2021
- Case Number
- BA-24C-5-03/2021, BA-24C-7-03/2021 & BA-24C-10-04/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons Setting Aside, Stay and Enforcement Under CIPAA / Judgment on Three Originating Summonses
- Outcome
- Setting Aside OS dismissed; Stay OS dismissed; Enforcement OS granted in part (partial enforcement of adjudication decision)
- Legal Topics
- CIPAA 2012 Application, Adjudicator Jurisdiction and Powers, Setting Aside Adjudication, Enforcement of Adjudication Decision, Stay Pending Arbitration, Natural Justice in Adjudication, Costs of Adjudication
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Integral Acres Sdn. Bhd.
Plaintiff/defendant (cross Applications)
BCEG International (M) Sdn. Bhd.
Defendant/plaintiff (cross Applications)
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons Setting Aside, Stay and Enforcement Under CIPAA / Judgment on Three Originating Summonses
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether adjudicator exceeded jurisdiction by awarding non-payment related losses (Loss of EOT and costs of proceedings)
- 2 Whether adjudicator had power to award costs/fees of a previous adjudication after resignation of previous adjudicator
- 3 Whether amounts in adjudication beyond sums claimed in payment claim are permissible
Ratio Decidendi
The court held the adjudicator had jurisdiction to decide unpaid certified works and to award interest thereon, but exceeded jurisdiction under CIPAA by adjudicating Loss (EOT) and costs relating to BCEG's disputes with subcontractors (these are not "payment" under s4 and no written extension under s27(2) existed); the adjudicator also lacked power to award costs/fees of the previous adjudication after the prior adjudicator resigned; the court refused to set aside the valid parts and granted partial enforcement of the adjudication (specified sums and costs of this adjudication) and dismissed applications to set aside and to stay enforcement.
Court Disposition
Setting Aside OS dismissed; Stay OS dismissed; Enforcement OS granted in part (partial enforcement of adjudication decision)
Orders
- Setting Aside OS BA-24C-5-03/2021 dismissed
- Stay OS BA-24C-10-04/2021 dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment