AMALAN SETAR (M) SDN BHD CHARTER BUILT CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD
The court found no material breach of natural justice and no clear and unequivocal errors in the Adjudicator's Decision; the adjudicator addressed the contested matters and CBC demonstrated a prima facie right to the sum claimed based on the Final Account and admissions; consequently the stay and setting-aside applications were dismissed and the adjudication decision enforced as a judgment under s28 CIPAA.
- Citation
- WA-24C-187-11/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Applicant (os 160); Respondent (os 175 & 187): Charter Built Construction Sdn Bhd; Respondent (os 160); Applicant (os 175 & 187): Amalan Setar (M) Sdn Bhd
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 6 May 2024
- Case Number
- WA-24C-187-11/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons Under CIPAA for Enforcement, Stay and Setting Aside of Adjudication Decision / Hearing and Judgment (final Determination on OS 160, OS 175 and OS 187)
- Outcome
- OS 187 and OS 175 dismissed with costs; OS 160 granted and Adjudication Decision dated 18.8.2023 (corrected 28.8.2023) enforced as judgment of the Court.
- Legal Topics
- CIPAA Enforcement (s28), Setting Aside Adjudication (s15), Stay of Enforcement (s16), Natural Justice (audi Alteram Partem), Defects Liability Period, Extensions of Time, Final Certificate and Final Account, Interest and Costs
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charter Built Construction Sdn Bhd
Applicant (os 160); Respondent (os 175 & 187)
Amalan Setar (M) Sdn Bhd
Respondent (os 160); Applicant (os 175 & 187)
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons Under CIPAA for Enforcement, Stay and Setting Aside of Adjudication Decision / Hearing and Judgment (final Determination on OS 160, OS 175 and OS 187)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the adjudicator failed to decide on date the Final Claim ought to have been issued
- 2 Whether the adjudicator failed to decide on the duration of the Defects Liability Period (DLP)
- 3 Whether there was a breach of natural justice (audi alteram partem) in the adjudication
Ratio Decidendi
The court found no material breach of natural justice and no clear and unequivocal errors in the Adjudicator's Decision; the adjudicator addressed the contested matters and CBC demonstrated a prima facie right to the sum claimed based on the Final Account and admissions; consequently the stay and setting-aside applications were dismissed and the adjudication decision enforced as a judgment under s28 CIPAA.
Court Disposition
OS 187 and OS 175 dismissed with costs; OS 160 granted and Adjudication Decision dated 18.8.2023 (corrected 28.8.2023) enforced as judgment of the Court.
Orders
- Dismiss OS 187 with costs
- Dismiss OS 175 with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment