PEMIUTANG PENGHAKIMAN Fujifilm Business Innovation Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (dahulunya dikenali sebagai Fuji Xerox Asia Pacific Pte Ltd) PENGHUTANG PENGHAKIMAN GHAPAR SHAH BIN MOHAMED (MOHD SHAH)
Where a company has lawfully changed its name but retains the same company number and identity, the change of name does not invalidate prior judgments or a creditor's petition nor does it mislead a debtor when the intitulement discloses the former name; further affidavits in support of a creditor's petition are permissible and the JD was not prejudiced — accordingly the JD's Notice of Intention to Oppose was dismissed and the creditor's petition proceeded to be fixed for hearing.
- Citation
- JA-29NCC-249-07/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Creditor / Petitioner: Fujifilm Business Innovation Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (formerly Fuji Xerox Asia Pacific Pte Ltd); Judgment Debtor: Ghapar Shah bin Mohamed (Mohd Shah)
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 22 March 2022
- Case Number
- JA-29NCC-249-07/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy (creditor's Petition) / Interlocutory — Decision on Judgment Debtor's Notice of Intention to Oppose
- Outcome
- Judgment Debtor's Notice of Intention to Oppose dismissed; Creditor's Petition to proceed to hearing
- Legal Topics
- Change of Company Name, Creditor's Petition, Notice of Intention to Oppose, Service and Admissibility of Affidavit, Act of Bankruptcy
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fujifilm Business Innovation Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (formerly Fuji Xerox Asia Pacific Pte Ltd)
Creditor / Petitioner
Ghapar Shah bin Mohamed (Mohd Shah)
Judgment Debtor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy (creditor's Petition) / Interlocutory — Decision on Judgment Debtor's Notice of Intention to Oppose
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a change of company name invalidates or renders defective a creditor's petition or bankruptcy notice
- 2 Whether the difference in names could mislead, embarrass or perplex the Judgment Debtor
- 3 Whether an additional affidavit filed in support of the Creditor's Petition was permissible and whether personal service on the JD was required
Ratio Decidendi
Where a company has lawfully changed its name but retains the same company number and identity, the change of name does not invalidate prior judgments or a creditor's petition nor does it mislead a debtor when the intitulement discloses the former name; further affidavits in support of a creditor's petition are permissible and the JD was not prejudiced — accordingly the JD's Notice of Intention to Oppose was dismissed and the creditor's petition proceeded to be fixed for hearing.
Court Disposition
Judgment Debtor's Notice of Intention to Oppose dismissed; Creditor's Petition to proceed to hearing
Orders
- Dismissal of the Judgment Debtor's Notice of Intention to Oppose the Creditor's Petition
- Creditor's Petition fixed for hearing on 11/5/2022
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment