SITI AZRIN BINTI MOHAMAD AINI
The court convicted the accused on her unreserved guilty pleas and imposed imprisonment because the deliberate misuse of Lembaga Zakat Selangor funds totalling RM170,575 was a serious breach of public trust; while the guilty plea and personal mitigations were considered, public interest, deterrence and the scale of misappropriation warranted custodial sentences of six months (first count) and one year (second count), with postponement of execution of the sentences granted.
- Citation
- BA-83-2944-11/2024 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Parties
- Prosecution: Pendakwa Raya; Defendant (orang Kena Tuduh): Siti Azrin binti Mohamad Aini
- Court
- Magistrates' Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 26 August 2025
- Case Number
- BA-83-2944-11/2024 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Cheating (section 417) / Sentencing / Judgment (guilty Plea Recorded)
- Outcome
- Accused convicted on two counts after guilty plea and sentenced to imprisonment.
- Legal Topics
- Cheating Under Section 417, Sentencing, Mitigation, Public Interest, Plea of Guilty
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pendakwa Raya
Prosecution
Siti Azrin binti Mohamad Aini
Defendant (orang Kena Tuduh)
Procedural Posture
Criminal Cheating (section 417) / Sentencing / Judgment (guilty Plea Recorded)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused committed cheating under Section 417 by altering WAZ recipient details
- 2 Appropriate sentence in light of the sums misappropriated and mitigating personal circumstances
- 3 Whether public interest and deterrence outweigh mitigating factors of pregnancy, dependants and first offence
Ratio Decidendi
The court convicted the accused on her unreserved guilty pleas and imposed imprisonment because the deliberate misuse of Lembaga Zakat Selangor funds totalling RM170,575 was a serious breach of public trust; while the guilty plea and personal mitigations were considered, public interest, deterrence and the scale of misappropriation warranted custodial sentences of six months (first count) and one year (second count), with postponement of execution of the sentences granted.
Court Disposition
Accused convicted on two counts after guilty plea and sentenced to imprisonment.
Orders
- Count 1: Six (6) months imprisonment from date of conviction.
- Count 2: One (1) year imprisonment from date of conviction.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment