YASAK BIN IBRAHIM 1. ) PEJABAT TANAH DAN GALIAN PULAU PINANG 2. ) Kerajaan Negeri Pulau Pinang
The Court of Appeal affirmed the High Court: the plaintiff's cause of action accrued long before the 2019 writ, contemporaneous documents show knowledge and acceptance of compensation, and the claim is therefore time-barred under s2 Public Authorities Protection Act 1948 (36-month limit); consequently the striking out under Order 18 r19 was appropriate and the appeal is dismissed.
- Citation
- P-01(IM)(NCvC)-638-11/2021 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Appellant / Plaintiff: Yasak bin Ibrahim (bertindak sebagai Pemegang Kuasa kepada pewaris-pewaris si mati Shuaib @ Shuib bin Hussain); 1st Respondent / Defendant: Pejabat Tanah dan Galian Pulau Pinang; 2nd Respondent / Defendant: Kerajaan Negeri Pulau Pinang
- Court
- IM
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2024
- Case Number
- P-01(IM)(NCvC)-638-11/2021 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (court of Appeal) / Decision on Appeal From High Court Order Striking Out Claim Under Order 18 R19 (strike Out)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Compulsory Acquisition, Limitation / Statute of Limitations, Public Authorities Protection Act 1948 S2, Strike Out / Frivolous Vexatious Abuse of Process, Locus Standi, Form E Defects
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yasak bin Ibrahim (bertindak sebagai Pemegang Kuasa kepada pewaris-pewaris si mati Shuaib @ Shuib bin Hussain)
Appellant / Plaintiff
Pejabat Tanah dan Galian Pulau Pinang
1st Respondent / Defendant
Kerajaan Negeri Pulau Pinang
2nd Respondent / Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (court of Appeal) / Decision on Appeal From High Court Order Striking Out Claim Under Order 18 R19 (strike Out)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff's claim challenging compulsory acquisition is time-barred under the Public Authorities Protection Act 1948 s2
- 2 Whether contemporaneous documentary evidence defeats the plaintiff's affidavit allegations about a defective Form E
- 3 Whether the plaintiff had locus standi to bring the action as constituted
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal affirmed the High Court: the plaintiff's cause of action accrued long before the 2019 writ, contemporaneous documents show knowledge and acceptance of compensation, and the claim is therefore time-barred under s2 Public Authorities Protection Act 1948 (36-month limit); consequently the striking out under Order 18 r19 was appropriate and the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Respondents awarded costs of RM10,000.00 (no alokatur)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment