Mohd Razif Bin Zainal Abidin 1. ) Perodua Sales Sdn Bhd 2. ) MAHKAMAH PERUSAHAAN MALAYSIA
The Court of Appeal held that where a transfer clause expressly requires transfers to be 'reasonably directed by the Company' that reasonableness is an express contractual term to be applied within the contract test for constructive dismissal; applying that test to the facts, the Company’s conduct (mandatory resignations to join NAM, abrupt 3‑day transfer notices to distant posts, failure to secure work permits, and lack of transparency about vacancies) evidenced mala fides and a repudiatory breach so the Industrial Court’s awards for constructive dismissal were reinstated and the High Court’s quashing of those awards set aside.
- Citation
- W-01(A)-478-08/2021 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Appellant/perayu: Saharunzaman bin Barun; Appellant/perayu: Noramidah bt Othman @ Anuar; Appellant/perayu: Mohd Razif bin Zainal Abidin; Respondent/pemohon: Perodua Sales Sdn Bhd; Respondent/second Respondent: Mahkamah Perusahaan Malaysia
- Court
- A
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 2 December 2024
- Case Number
- W-01(A)-478-08/2021 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeals From High Court Quashing Industrial Court Awards (industrial Relations/constructive Dismissal) / Court of Appeal Decision on Appeal (judgment)
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed. High Court orders quashing Industrial Court Awards set aside. Industrial Court Awards reinstated for each appellant. Costs awarded.
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Dismissal, Transfer of Employment, Managerial Prerogative, Contract Test Vs Reasonableness, Illegality (work Permit), Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Saharunzaman bin Barun
Appellant/perayu
Noramidah bt Othman @ Anuar
Appellant/perayu
Mohd Razif bin Zainal Abidin
Appellant/perayu
Perodua Sales Sdn Bhd
Respondent/pemohon
Mahkamah Perusahaan Malaysia
Respondent/second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeals From High Court Quashing Industrial Court Awards (industrial Relations/constructive Dismissal) / Court of Appeal Decision on Appeal (judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a transfer clause containing 'reasonably directed by the Company' incorporates a contractual reasonableness requirement to be applied within the contract test for constructive dismissal
- 2 Whether the Company’s conduct in the transfer exercise was mala fide or for a collateral purpose evincing intention not to be bound by the contract
- 3 Whether absence of required work permits renders the transfer exercise illegal and vitiates the Company’s disciplinary response
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held that where a transfer clause expressly requires transfers to be 'reasonably directed by the Company' that reasonableness is an express contractual term to be applied within the contract test for constructive dismissal; applying that test to the facts, the Company’s conduct (mandatory resignations to join NAM, abrupt 3‑day transfer notices to distant posts, failure to secure work permits, and lack of transparency about vacancies) evidenced mala fides and a repudiatory breach so the Industrial Court’s awards for constructive dismissal were reinstated and the High Court’s quashing of those awards set aside.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed. High Court orders quashing Industrial Court Awards set aside. Industrial Court Awards reinstated for each appellant. Costs awarded.
Orders
- Set aside High Court judgments that quashed the Industrial Court Awards
- Reinstate the Industrial Court Awards in favour of Saharunzaman bin Barun, Noramidah bt Othman @ Anuar and Mohd Razif bin Zainal Abidin
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment