1. STELLA SUMATHI A/P ANTHONYSAMY (Membawa tindakan ini melalui ibu dan wakil litigasinya, Kedua) 2. KULANTHAI THERASAMAH A/P S. AMBROSE 1. RAMLEE BIN NAWIR 2. ROMIDAH BINTI ISMAIL
The High Court affirmed the Sessions Court: contemporaneous police reports from the eyewitness and defendant, combined with photographic and vehicle damage evidence and investigating officers' findings, made it most probable the collision occurred while the plaintiff was crossing the road; both parties were partially at fault and liability was properly apportioned equally (50% each); appellate interference with the factual finding was unwarranted.
- Citation
- BA-12B-100-07/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant Plaintiff: STELLA SUMATHI A/P ANTHONYSAMY; Appellant Plaintiff: KULANTHAI THERASAMAH A/P S. AMBROSE; Respondent Defendant: RAMLEE BIN NAWIR; Respondent Defendant: ROMIDAH BINTI ISMAIL
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 5 May 2020
- Case Number
- BA-12B-100-07/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal From Sessions Court — Running Down/motor Vehicle Negligence / High Court Appeal on Liability (judgment)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; decision of the Sessions Court affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Contributory Negligence, Apportionment of Liability, Assessment of Factual Findings on Appeal, Weight of Contemporaneous Police Reports, Credibility of Witnesses
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
STELLA SUMATHI A/P ANTHONYSAMY
Appellant Plaintiff
KULANTHAI THERASAMAH A/P S. AMBROSE
Appellant Plaintiff
RAMLEE BIN NAWIR
Respondent Defendant
ROMIDAH BINTI ISMAIL
Respondent Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal From Sessions Court — Running Down/motor Vehicle Negligence / High Court Appeal on Liability (judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Sessions Court Judge erred in finding liability apportioned 50:50
- 2 Whether the collision occurred at the road divider or while the plaintiff was crossing the road
- 3 Whether the police reports and vehicle damage evidence should be preferred over trial testimony
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court affirmed the Sessions Court: contemporaneous police reports from the eyewitness and defendant, combined with photographic and vehicle damage evidence and investigating officers' findings, made it most probable the collision occurred while the plaintiff was crossing the road; both parties were partially at fault and liability was properly apportioned equally (50% each); appellate interference with the factual finding was unwarranted.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; decision of the Sessions Court affirmed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Decision of the Sessions Court affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment