PEMIUTANG PENGHAKIMAN 1. ) Saling Bin Lau Bee Chiang 2. ) KAMIL BIN JANTAN 3. ) NORLIAH BINTI SALLEH 4. ) ANTOI BIN MABOT 5. ) MOHD NOR KAMISAN BIN WAHAB 6. ) TAN BIN JANTAN 7. ) SOOI TEE TOOTOI 8. ) SABTU BIN BATIN SALLEH 9. ) ISMAIL BIN J
The deletion of three named petitioning creditors from a multi-creditor creditor's petition, without application to amend or court order, substantively changed the character of the creditor's petition as originally founded on a collective act of bankruptcy by 26 creditors; per Ambank v Lim Sue Beng this is fatal to the petition and renders the resultant Bankruptcy Order invalid, therefore the appeal setting aside the CP must be allowed and the BO set aside.
- Citation
- WA-29NCC-306-03/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Judgment Debtor: Dinesh Kanavaji A/L Kanawagi; Judgment Creditors: Saling bin Lau Bee Chiang & 25 ORS; Judgment Creditor: Rabia bt Abdul Halim (JC18)
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 5 March 2026
- Case Number
- WA-29NCC-306-03/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy (creditor's Petition and Bankruptcy Order) / High Court Judgment on Appeals From Registrar's Refusal to Set Aside Creditor's Petition and Bankruptcy Order; Notices of Appeal to Court of Appeal Filed
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Creditor's Petition set aside; Bankruptcy Order set aside; costs awarded
- Legal Topics
- Creditor's Petition, Bankruptcy Notice, Amendment of Petition, Removal of Co Petitioner, Validity of Bankruptcy Order, Costs
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dinesh Kanavaji A/L Kanawagi
Judgment Debtor
Saling bin Lau Bee Chiang & 25 ORS
Judgment Creditors
Rabia bt Abdul Halim (JC18)
Judgment Creditor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy (creditor's Petition and Bankruptcy Order) / High Court Judgment on Appeals From Registrar's Refusal to Set Aside Creditor's Petition and Bankruptcy Order; Notices of Appeal to Court of Appeal Filed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether deletion of named petitioning creditors from a multi-creditor creditor's petition without amendment application or court order changes the character of the petition and invalidates it
- 2 Whether a creditor may withdraw or be removed such that the original bankruptcy notice and creditor's petition are substantively recharacterised without issuing a new bankruptcy notice
- 3 Whether a Bankruptcy Order made pursuant to an invalid creditor's petition is itself invalid
Ratio Decidendi
The deletion of three named petitioning creditors from a multi-creditor creditor's petition, without application to amend or court order, substantively changed the character of the creditor's petition as originally founded on a collective act of bankruptcy by 26 creditors; per Ambank v Lim Sue Beng this is fatal to the petition and renders the resultant Bankruptcy Order invalid, therefore the appeal setting aside the CP must be allowed and the BO set aside.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Creditor's Petition set aside; Bankruptcy Order set aside; costs awarded
Orders
- Allowed appeal in Encl 176 and set aside the Creditor's Petition (Encl 151) as invalid
- Allowed Encl 216 and Encl 241 and set aside the Bankruptcy Order dated 14.11.2024 (Encl 221) made pursuant to the invalid CP
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment