MOHD AZWAN BIN AZLAN MANIMARAN
Accused's evidence was implausible and inconsistent, prosecution proved elements of dangerous driving under s.41(1) RTA 1987 by credible witness and physical evidence; accused's flight, delay in reporting and alteration of his motorcycle justified adverse inferences under ss.8 and 114(g) Evidence Act 1950; failure to keep left in presence of a vehicle signalling to turn right breached LN166/59 and caused the fatal collision — conviction warranted and sentence imposed.
- Citation
- NB-83-145-09/2023 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Parties
- Prosecution: Pendakwa Raya; Accused: Mohd Azwan bin Mohd Azlan Manimaran
- Court
- Magistrates' Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2024
- Case Number
- NB-83-145-09/2023 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Dangerous Driving Causing Death (section 41(1) Road Transport Act 1987) / Judgment at End of Defence and Sentencing (magistrates' Court Following High Court Direction to Call Accused to Defence)
- Outcome
- Accused found guilty and convicted under Section 41(1) Road Transport Act 1987
- Legal Topics
- Dangerous Driving Causing Death, Prima Facie Test at Close of Prosecution, Evidence of Conduct/flight (s.8 Evidence Act 1950), Presumption From Destroyed/non Produced Evidence (s.114(g) Evidence Act 1950), Traffic Regulations Ln166/59 (rules 3(1), 5), Burden to Explain Conduct (s.9 Evidence Act 1950)
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pendakwa Raya
Prosecution
Mohd Azwan bin Mohd Azlan Manimaran
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Dangerous Driving Causing Death (section 41(1) Road Transport Act 1987) / Judgment at End of Defence and Sentencing (magistrates' Court Following High Court Direction to Call Accused to Defence)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether prosecution proved elements of Section 41(1) RTA 1987
- 2 Credibility of accused's testimony and whether it is afterthought
- 3 Admissibility and weight of accused's flight and alteration of vehicle as evidence under s.8 and s.114(g) Evidence Act 1950
Ratio Decidendi
Accused's evidence was implausible and inconsistent, prosecution proved elements of dangerous driving under s.41(1) RTA 1987 by credible witness and physical evidence; accused's flight, delay in reporting and alteration of his motorcycle justified adverse inferences under ss.8 and 114(g) Evidence Act 1950; failure to keep left in presence of a vehicle signalling to turn right breached LN166/59 and caused the fatal collision — conviction warranted and sentence imposed.
Court Disposition
Accused found guilty and convicted under Section 41(1) Road Transport Act 1987
Orders
- Sentenced to 2 years imprisonment
- Fine of RM 5000 and in default of payment to undergo 6 months imprisonment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment