GOPU A/L PUPATHY
The court concluded that the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused's right turn and driving constituted dangerous driving and was the operative cause of the fatality, satisfying the elements of s41(1) Road Transport Act 1987.
- Citation
- MC-83-121-03/2025 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Public Prosecutor; Accused: Gopu a/l Pupathy
- Court
- Magistrates' Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2026
- Case Number
- MC-83-121-03/2025 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Convicted under section 41(1) Road Transport Act 1987; matter adjourned for sentencing
- Legal Topics
- Dangerous Driving Causing Death, Section 41(1) Road Transport Act 1987, Causation, Evidence
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Public Prosecutor
Prosecutor
Gopu a/l Pupathy
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused's driving constituted dangerous driving under s41(1) Road Transport Act 1987
- 2 Whether the prosecution proved causation between the accused's manoeuvre and the death
- 3 Whether the evidence adduced (eyewitness, photographs, pathology, digital forensics) was sufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt
Ratio Decidendi
The court concluded that the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused's right turn and driving constituted dangerous driving and was the operative cause of the fatality, satisfying the elements of s41(1) Road Transport Act 1987.
Court Disposition
Convicted under section 41(1) Road Transport Act 1987; matter adjourned for sentencing
Orders
- Accused convicted under section 41(1) Road Transport Act 1987
- Case adjourned for sentencing
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment