TEH SIOK YEN 1. ) Loke Wai Kuen 2. ) Lee Wei Lid
High Court upheld Sessions Court's factual findings that 1st–3rd defendants' renovation works caused water seepage and were liable in negligence and private nuisance; however, Sessions Court erred in awarding excessive general damages without medical evidence and failing to consider mitigation, so general damages were reduced from RM200,000 to RM10,000; 4th defendant (developer) was not liable under the DMC or in tort because DMC did not bind non-signatory purchasers, clause 9 proviso excluded developer liability for others' breaches, there was insufficient proximity and causation and plaintiffs' losses were too remote under s74 Contracts Act; costs were adjusted applying the subordinate...
- Citation
- BA-12BC-2-04/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant (4th Defendant): Tropicana Golf & Country Resort Berhad; Appellant (1st of 1st 3rd Defendants): Teh Siok Yen; Appellant (2nd of 1st 3rd Defendants): Teh Guan Chuan; Appellant (3rd of 1st 3rd Defendants): Teh Siok Lee; Respondent (1st Plaintiff): Loke Wei Kuen; Respondent (2nd Plaintiff): Lee Wei Lid
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 2022
- Case Number
- BA-12BC-2-04/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeals to High Court From Sessions Court Judgment After Trial / Judgment on Consolidated Appeals (final Disposition)
- Outcome
- Consolidated appeals disposed: appeals by Teh Siok Yen, Teh Guan Chuan and Teh Siok Lee (1st–3rd defendants) partially dismissed/allowed to the extent of varying damages and costs; appeal by Tropicana Golf & Country Resort Berhad (4th defendant) allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Deed of Mutual Covenants, Negligence, Private Nuisance, Expert Evidence Admissibility (s45 Evidence Act), Remoteness and Causation, Mitigation of Loss, Pre Judgment Interest, Costs Scale and Assessment, Implied Terms in Contract
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tropicana Golf & Country Resort Berhad
Appellant (4th Defendant)
Teh Siok Yen
Appellant (1st of 1st 3rd Defendants)
Teh Guan Chuan
Appellant (2nd of 1st 3rd Defendants)
Teh Siok Lee
Appellant (3rd of 1st 3rd Defendants)
Loke Wei Kuen
Respondent (1st Plaintiff)
Lee Wei Lid
Respondent (2nd Plaintiff)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeals to High Court From Sessions Court Judgment After Trial / Judgment on Consolidated Appeals (final Disposition)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Sessions Court erred in admitting and preferring plaintiffs' architect as expert under s45 Evidence Act and rejecting defendants' expert
- 2 Whether 1st-3rd defendants liable in negligence and private nuisance causing water seepage and consequential losses
- 3 Whether general damages for emotional distress were supported by medical evidence and mitigation and whether amount was excessive
Ratio Decidendi
High Court upheld Sessions Court's factual findings that 1st–3rd defendants' renovation works caused water seepage and were liable in negligence and private nuisance; however, Sessions Court erred in awarding excessive general damages without medical evidence and failing to consider mitigation, so general damages were reduced from RM200,000 to RM10,000; 4th defendant (developer) was not liable under the DMC or in tort because DMC did not bind non-signatory purchasers, clause 9 proviso excluded developer liability for others' breaches, there was insufficient proximity and causation and plaintiffs' losses were too remote under s74 Contracts Act; costs were adjusted applying the subordinate...
Court Disposition
Consolidated appeals disposed: appeals by Teh Siok Yen, Teh Guan Chuan and Teh Siok Lee (1st–3rd defendants) partially dismissed/allowed to the extent of varying damages and costs; appeal by Tropicana Golf & Country Resort Berhad (4th defendant) allowed.
Orders
- Judgment against 1st to 3rd Defendants reduced to MYR 115682.90 in total damages payable to plaintiffs (reduction from Sessions Court award)
- General damages for plaintiffs' emotional distress reduced from MYR 200000.00 to MYR 10000.00
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment