TAI MAY CHEAN (NRIC NO.: 531113-10-5670) 1. UNITED EASTERN RESOURCES SDN BHD (COMPANY NO.: 416181-T) 2. NG PIK LIAN (NRIC NO.: 320718-05-5012)
The Court of Appeal held the appellant satisfied the subjective element of good faith (honest belief in a good cause of action with reasonable prospects) and the proposed derivative action was prima facie in the best interest of the company because the company paid the redemption sum, transfer documents were prepared but not executed, rentals were retained by the vendor, and imminent limitation and statutory/directorial duties justified allowing the action; pending mental health proceedings, winding up petition, delay and prior criminal charge did not, on the facts, defeat leave. Consequently the High Court's dismissal was set aside and leave granted.
- Citation
- W-02(NCC)(A)-1955-10/2019 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Appellant / Plaintiff: Tai May Chean; First Respondent / Nominal Defendant: United Eastern Resources Sdn Bhd; Second Respondent / Defendant: Ng Pik Lian
- Court
- NCC
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 2021
- Case Number
- W-02(NCC)(A)-1955-10/2019 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Derivative Action Under Companies Act 2016 (leave to Commence Derivative Suit) / Appeal to Court of Appeal Against High Court Dismissal of Leave Application; Decision on Leave Application
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; High Court order dismissing leave application set aside; leave granted to commence derivative action by United Eastern Resources Sdn Bhd against TYY Resources Sdn Bhd
- Legal Topics
- Derivative Action, Directors' Duties and Liabilities, Leave to Commence Derivative Proceedings, Limitation of Actions (specific Performance), Mental Capacity / Mental Health Act Issues, Winding Up (just and Equitable), Constructive Trust / Transfer of Title
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tai May Chean
Appellant / Plaintiff
United Eastern Resources Sdn Bhd
First Respondent / Nominal Defendant
Ng Pik Lian
Second Respondent / Defendant
Procedural Posture
Derivative Action Under Companies Act 2016 (leave to Commence Derivative Suit) / Appeal to Court of Appeal Against High Court Dismissal of Leave Application; Decision on Leave Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicant was acting in good faith for purposes of s.348(4) Companies Act 2016
- 2 Whether proposed derivative action is prima facie in the best interest of the company
- 3 Effect of pending mental health proceedings on leave application
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held the appellant satisfied the subjective element of good faith (honest belief in a good cause of action with reasonable prospects) and the proposed derivative action was prima facie in the best interest of the company because the company paid the redemption sum, transfer documents were prepared but not executed, rentals were retained by the vendor, and imminent limitation and statutory/directorial duties justified allowing the action; pending mental health proceedings, winding up petition, delay and prior criminal charge did not, on the facts, defeat leave. Consequently the High Court's dismissal was set aside and leave granted.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; High Court order dismissing leave application set aside; leave granted to commence derivative action by United Eastern Resources Sdn Bhd against TYY Resources Sdn Bhd
Orders
- Set aside High Court order dated 24.10.2019 dismissing leave application
- Grant leave for plaintiff/appellant to commence derivative action in the name of United Eastern Resources Sdn Bhd against TYY Resources Sdn Bhd under ss 345, 347 and 348 Companies Act 2016
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment