PEMIUTANG PENGHAKIMAN LINGGI AGRICULTURE SDN BHD PENGHUTANG PENGHAKIMAN CHIN SU HIN
Court held Notice 51C was timely because actual delivery per postal tracking was 21.10.2022 and the objection filed 1.11.2022 fell within the 21-day statutory period; the Insolvency (Amendment) 2023 did not apply to this pending proceeding by virtue of s17 and thus s33B(2A) did not bar the objection; DGI is not required to prepare a separate report when issuing a s33A certificate, but in this case the DGI had failed to properly administer the estate (no meetings, no enquiries, no dividends, inadequate steps to locate debtor) and therefore exercised discretion unreasonably; accordingly the court granted an injunction restraining issuance of the discharge certificate for two years from...
- Citation
- JA-29PB-395-06/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Judgment Creditor: Chin Su Hin; Judgment Debtor: Linggi Agriculture Sdn Bhd; Director General of Insolvency (respondent): Ketua Pengarah Insolvensi, Jabatan Insolvensi Malaysia (Johor Bahru)
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2023
- Case Number
- JA-29PB-395-06/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Post Bankruptcy Application Under S33 B(4) to Restrain Issuance of Discharge Certificate / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part; interlocutory injunction granted restraining DGI from issuing discharge certificate
- Legal Topics
- Discharge of Bankrupt, Director General of Insolvency Discretion, Service of Statutory Notices, Retrospectivity of Statutory Amendments, Creditor Objections, Administration of Estate
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chin Su Hin
Judgment Creditor
Linggi Agriculture Sdn Bhd
Judgment Debtor
Ketua Pengarah Insolvensi, Jabatan Insolvensi Malaysia (Johor Bahru)
Director General of Insolvency (respondent)
Procedural Posture
Post Bankruptcy Application Under S33 B(4) to Restrain Issuance of Discharge Certificate / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether creditor's Notice 51C was filed within the 21-day statutory period under s33B(2)
- 2 Whether amendments to s33B (s33B(2A)) barred the creditor's objection
- 3 Whether the Director General of Insolvency was required to prepare a report before issuing a s33A discharge certificate
Ratio Decidendi
Court held Notice 51C was timely because actual delivery per postal tracking was 21.10.2022 and the objection filed 1.11.2022 fell within the 21-day statutory period; the Insolvency (Amendment) 2023 did not apply to this pending proceeding by virtue of s17 and thus s33B(2A) did not bar the objection; DGI is not required to prepare a separate report when issuing a s33A certificate, but in this case the DGI had failed to properly administer the estate (no meetings, no enquiries, no dividends, inadequate steps to locate debtor) and therefore exercised discretion unreasonably; accordingly the court granted an injunction restraining issuance of the discharge certificate for two years from...
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part; interlocutory injunction granted restraining DGI from issuing discharge certificate
Orders
- KPI (Director General of Insolvency) is restrained from issuing a certificate of discharge under s33A of the Insolvency Act 1967 for the judgment debtor from 22.11.2023 until 21.11.2025 (2 years)
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment