TAN HENG CHEW v TAN KIM HOR
The appeal was dismissed because the appellants advanced a new and different test in the Federal Court that had not been argued or considered in the High Court or Court of Appeal, making the lower courts' factual findings central to the original grounds irrelevant and requiring this Court to assume unproven facts; the Court will not decide such an academic issue or apply foreign tests without proper canvass and factual findings below.
- Citation
- TAN HENG CHEW v TAN KIM HOR
- Parties
- Appellants: Tan Heng Chew & Ors; Respondents: Tan Kim Hor & Ors
- Court
- Malaysian court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Judgment (federal Court)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Disqualification of Solicitors, Confidential Information, Test for Disqualification, Leave to Appeal, Academic Questions
- Source Language
- en
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tan Heng Chew & Ors
Appellants
Tan Kim Hor & Ors
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment (federal Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the proper test for disqualifying a firm of solicitors from acting for parties in subsequent litigation
- 2 Whether the Federal Court should decide a new test not raised or argued in the courts below
- 3 Whether the appeal raised purely academic issues requiring assumptions of unproven facts
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the appellants advanced a new and different test in the Federal Court that had not been argued or considered in the High Court or Court of Appeal, making the lower courts' factual findings central to the original grounds irrelevant and requiring this Court to assume unproven facts; the Court will not decide such an academic issue or apply foreign tests without proper canvass and factual findings below.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Deposit ordered to be paid to respondents to account of their taxed costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment