LEE CHEE KUAN 1. YOGESWARAN A/L SINNAIAH 2. SINNAIAH A/L SUBBIAH
A rider who rides without a valid licence and without insurance is acting unlawfully and, as a matter of public policy and equity, is precluded from claiming against another road user; the rider (Respondent 1) is 100% liable for the collision. A pillion passenger who knowingly rides with an unlicensed rider bears liability in respect of that rider (and cannot claim against the third-party appellant); exceptions exist only for recognized emergencies. Payment of a traffic summons constitutes an admission that prevents subsequent prosecution for the same offence (double jeopardy protection).
- Citation
- JA-12B-117-12/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Perayu/defendan: Lee Chee Kuan; Responden/plaintif: Yogeswaran a/l Sinniah
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 5 November 2019
- Case Number
- JA-12B-117-12/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal at High Court (johor Bahru)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Sessions Court judgment set aside. Appellant (driver) absolved of liability. Respondent/Plaintiff 1 (rider) held 100% liable. Respondent/Plaintiff 2 (pillion) must pursue remedy against rider, not against appellant.
- Legal Topics
- Driving Without Licence, Liability and Damages, Contributory/secondary Liability of Pillion Passenger, Effect of Paying Traffic Summons as Admission/double Jeopardy, Public Policy and Exclusion From Remedies
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lee Chee Kuan
Perayu/defendan
Yogeswaran a/l Sinniah
Responden/plaintif
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal at High Court (johor Bahru)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a person without a valid motorcycle licence and without insurance is entitled to ride on the road
- 2 Whether a person without a licence can claim damages against a driver who had a valid licence
- 3 Whether a pillion passenger who knows the rider has no valid licence is vicariously or otherwise liable when injured
Ratio Decidendi
A rider who rides without a valid licence and without insurance is acting unlawfully and, as a matter of public policy and equity, is precluded from claiming against another road user; the rider (Respondent 1) is 100% liable for the collision. A pillion passenger who knowingly rides with an unlicensed rider bears liability in respect of that rider (and cannot claim against the third-party appellant); exceptions exist only for recognized emergencies. Payment of a traffic summons constitutes an admission that prevents subsequent prosecution for the same offence (double jeopardy protection).
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Sessions Court judgment set aside. Appellant (driver) absolved of liability. Respondent/Plaintiff 1 (rider) held 100% liable. Respondent/Plaintiff 2 (pillion) must pursue remedy against rider, not against appellant.
Orders
- Appeal allowed with costs to Perayu/Defendan (appellant).
- Decision of Sessions Court dated 13/12/2018 set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment