MUHAMAD HAIY ZIKRY BIN NOR AZIZAN (Seorang budak bawah umur yang menuntut melalui ibu dan sahabat wakilnya WAN KHASMAWATI BINTI WAN KHALID) 1. ) MUHAMMAD NURHISSAM BIN MOHD ASRI 2. ) MOHAMAD SAHADAN BIN MOHD ASRI PIHAK KETIGA WAN KHASMAWATI
Defendant 1 was 100% liable because he approached from behind on a straight village road, admitted seeing the child in advance yet maintained speed (50 km/h) and failed to slow or keep proper lookout; there were no brake marks to corroborate an effective attempt to avoid the collision and the plaintiff, an 8‑year‑old, could not be held contributorily negligent. Liability therefore rests solely with the defendant.
- Citation
- TD-A73KJ-45-04/2021 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Parties
- Plaintiff (minor Represented by Mother and Litigation Representative): Muhamad Haiy Zikry bin Nor Azizan; Defendant 1: Muhammad Nurhissam bin Mohd Asri; Defendant 2 (registered Owner of Motorcycle): Mohamad Sahadan bin Mohd Asri
- Court
- Magistrates' Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 2023
- Case Number
- TD-A73KJ-45-04/2021 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (motor Vehicle Accident / Personal Injury) / Trial Judgment on Liability
- Outcome
- Defendants held fully liable (100%) for the collision and plaintiff's personal injuries; plaintiff succeeds on liability.
- Legal Topics
- Duty of Following Driver, Failure to Keep Proper Lookout, Contributory Negligence, Liability of Child/plaintiff, Apportionment of Liability
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Muhamad Haiy Zikry bin Nor Azizan
Plaintiff (minor Represented by Mother and Litigation Representative)
Muhammad Nurhissam bin Mohd Asri
Defendant 1
Mohamad Sahadan bin Mohd Asri
Defendant 2 (registered Owner of Motorcycle)
Procedural Posture
Civil (motor Vehicle Accident / Personal Injury) / Trial Judgment on Liability
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Defendant 1 was negligent in colliding with the plaintiff's bicycle from behind
- 2 Whether the plaintiff (an 8‑year‑old) was contributorily negligent
- 3 Whether liability should be apportioned or fixed at 100% on the defendant
Ratio Decidendi
Defendant 1 was 100% liable because he approached from behind on a straight village road, admitted seeing the child in advance yet maintained speed (50 km/h) and failed to slow or keep proper lookout; there were no brake marks to corroborate an effective attempt to avoid the collision and the plaintiff, an 8‑year‑old, could not be held contributorily negligent. Liability therefore rests solely with the defendant.
Court Disposition
Defendants held fully liable (100%) for the collision and plaintiff's personal injuries; plaintiff succeeds on liability.
Orders
- Defendants found 100% liable for the collision and plaintiff's injuries.
- Assessment of damages/quantum to be determined separately (liability only decided in this judgment).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment