Lembaga Kumpulan Wang Simpanan Pekerja 1. ) MG BULLIONS HOLDING SDN BHD 2. ) MUHAMMAD NUR HISYAM BIN CHE MAHMOOD 3. ) MOHD AMLI BIN MAT ARSHAD

Lembaga Kumpulan Wang Simpanan Pekerja 1. ) MG BULLIONS HOLDING SDN BHD 2. ) MUHAMMAD NUR HISYAM BIN CHE MAHMOOD 3. ) MOHD AMLI BIN MAT ARSHAD

Plaintiff satisfied Order 14 prerequisites and established prima facie entitlement via served assessments/Form E and supporting affidavit; burden shifted to defendants who failed to raise bona fide triable issues or produce contradictory calculations or evidence of non‑receipt; defendants' denials were bare and unmeritorious; therefore summary judgment entered for plaintiff for the claimed amount and costs.

Citation
CA-A72NCvC-372-11/2023 (Mahkamah Majistret)
Parties
Plaintif: Lembaga Kumpulan Wang Simpanan Pekerja; Defendan Pertama: MG Bullions Holding Sdn Bhd; Defendan Kedua: Muhammad Nur Hisyam bin Che Mahmood; Defendan Ketiga: Mohd Amli bin Mat Arshad
Court
Magistrates' Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
29 April 2024
Case Number
CA-A72NCvC-372-11/2023 (Mahkamah Majistret)
Procedural Posture
Guaman Sivil / Permohonan Penghakiman Terus Di Bawah Aturan 14 (kaedah Kaedah Mahkamah 2012)
Outcome
Kandungan 9 dibenarkan; penghakiman terus dimasukkan untuk plaintif
Legal Topics
EPF Contributions, Liability of Directors, Summary Judgment (order 14), Service and Proof of Assessment, Conclusive Evidence of Form E
Source Language
Malay/English
Employment Law Statutory Enforcement Civil Procedure Pensions and Benefits EPF Contributions Liability of Directors Summary Judgment (order 14) Service and Proof of Assessment +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lembaga Kumpulan Wang Simpanan Pekerja

Plaintif

MG Bullions Holding Sdn Bhd

Defendan Pertama

Muhammad Nur Hisyam bin Che Mahmood

Defendan Kedua

Mohd Amli bin Mat Arshad

Defendan Ketiga

Procedural Posture

Guaman Sivil / Permohonan Penghakiman Terus Di Bawah Aturan 14 (kaedah Kaedah Mahkamah 2012)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether plaintiff satisfied the procedural and evidential requirements for summary judgment under Order 14
  2. 2 Whether defendants raised triable issues or meritorious defences
  3. 3 Whether EPF assessment/Form E and certificate constitute conclusive evidence of debt under EPF Act

Ratio Decidendi

Plaintiff satisfied Order 14 prerequisites and established prima facie entitlement via served assessments/Form E and supporting affidavit; burden shifted to defendants who failed to raise bona fide triable issues or produce contradictory calculations or evidence of non‑receipt; defendants' denials were bare and unmeritorious; therefore summary judgment entered for plaintiff for the claimed amount and costs.

Court Disposition

Kandungan 9 dibenarkan; penghakiman terus dimasukkan untuk plaintif

Orders

  • Penghakiman terus diberikan untuk plaintif terhadap defendan-defendan bagi jumlah tunggakan caruman KWSP RM57,197.00
  • Kos sebanyak RM1,000.00 dibenarkan untuk plaintif