NUR IRDINA BINTI RUSLI
Accused was properly convicted under S.381 Kanun Keseksaan for stealing RM14,103.19 as an employee; given the seriousness and public interest in deterring such breaches of trust, a custodial sentence of two months from date of sentence and a fine of RM5,000 (in default three months imprisonment) is appropriate despite mitigating factors including youth, remorse and family hardship; guilty plea did not merit a large discount because the evidence and exhibits plainly supported conviction.
- Citation
- BL-83RS-3-01/2022 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Parties
- Prosecution: Pendakwa Raya; Accused: Nur Irdina Binti Rusli
- Court
- Magistrates' Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 6 May 2024
- Case Number
- BL-83RS-3-01/2022 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal – Theft/breach of Trust Under Section 381 Penal Code / Conviction and Sentencing
- Outcome
- Accused convicted under Section 381 Penal Code and sentenced
- Legal Topics
- Employee Theft, Mitigation and Aggravation of Sentence, Public Interest in Sentencing, Stay of Execution/bail Pending Appeal
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pendakwa Raya
Prosecution
Nur Irdina Binti Rusli
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal – Theft/breach of Trust Under Section 381 Penal Code / Conviction and Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused committed an offence under S.381 Kanun Keseksaan
- 2 Appropriate sentence given the amount stolen and circumstances
- 3 Weight to be given to guilty plea and mitigating family circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
Accused was properly convicted under S.381 Kanun Keseksaan for stealing RM14,103.19 as an employee; given the seriousness and public interest in deterring such breaches of trust, a custodial sentence of two months from date of sentence and a fine of RM5,000 (in default three months imprisonment) is appropriate despite mitigating factors including youth, remorse and family hardship; guilty plea did not merit a large discount because the evidence and exhibits plainly supported conviction.
Court Disposition
Accused convicted under Section 381 Penal Code and sentenced
Orders
- Accused convicted under S.381 Kanun Keseksaan
- Sentence: Two (2) months imprisonment from date of sentence (6/5/2024)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment