PEMBINAAN JAYA ZIRA SDN BHD SUNGAI LUI CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD
The court found PJZ's challenges amounted to impermissible review/appeal of the arbitrator's factual and evaluative findings; there was no proven 'Ali Baba' illegality, no breach of natural justice regarding the Addendum, and the Arbitrator properly considered termination notices and the evidence on Category 1 and 2 claims; accordingly the Final Award is valid, recognized and enforceable and the application to set aside is dismissed.
- Citation
- WA-24C(ARB)-57-08/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff (os37) / Defendant (os57): Sungai Lui Construction & Development Sdn Bhd; Defendant (os37) / Plaintiff (os57): Pembinaan Jaya Zira Sdn Bhd
- Court
- ARB
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2025
- Case Number
- WA-24C(ARB)-57-08/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Arbitration Enforcement and Setting Aside of Award / Judgment on Originating Summons
- Outcome
- Originating Summons WA-24C(ARB)-57-08/2024 (OS57) dismissed; Final Award dated 31.5.2024 recognized and enforced as judgment; Originating Summons WA-24C(ARB)-37-06/2024 (OS37) allowed in part (enforcement).
- Legal Topics
- Enforcement of Arbitral Award, Setting Aside Arbitral Award, Illegality/'ali Baba' Arrangements, Breach of Natural Justice, Contract Termination, Assessment of Quantum and Valuation
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sungai Lui Construction & Development Sdn Bhd
Plaintiff (os37) / Defendant (os57)
Pembinaan Jaya Zira Sdn Bhd
Defendant (os37) / Plaintiff (os57)
Procedural Posture
Arbitration Enforcement and Setting Aside of Award / Judgment on Originating Summons
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitral award dated 31.5.2024 should be set aside for illegality/public policy ('Ali Baba') under Contracts Act 1950 s24(a)
- 2 Whether the arbitrator breached rules of natural justice by failing to consider relevant facts regarding the Addendum
- 3 Whether the Award conflicts with public policy by setting a dangerous precedent on termination
Ratio Decidendi
The court found PJZ's challenges amounted to impermissible review/appeal of the arbitrator's factual and evaluative findings; there was no proven 'Ali Baba' illegality, no breach of natural justice regarding the Addendum, and the Arbitrator properly considered termination notices and the evidence on Category 1 and 2 claims; accordingly the Final Award is valid, recognized and enforceable and the application to set aside is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Originating Summons WA-24C(ARB)-57-08/2024 (OS57) dismissed; Final Award dated 31.5.2024 recognized and enforced as judgment; Originating Summons WA-24C(ARB)-37-06/2024 (OS37) allowed in part (enforcement).
Orders
- Dismiss OS 57 with costs
- Recognize and enforce Final Award dated 31.5.2024 as judgment of the High Court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment