WONG KOK LEONG 1. ) FOO CHU JONG 2. ) MOOK TEN LOY
The ex‑parte interim injunction was set aside because O.29 r.1(2C) expressly prohibits granting ex‑parte injunctions that stop the holding or progress of an association meeting; additionally the plaintiff failed to make full and frank disclosure of material facts (knowledge of ROS system migration and internal committee discussions), thereby defeating the entitlement to equitable relief. The defendants' application to set aside the order is allowed with costs and damages to be assessed.
- Citation
- WA-24NCvC-2242-11/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff (committee Member of Kochow Association Malaysia): WONG KOK LEONG; First Defendant (president of Kochow Association Malaysia): FOO CHU JONG; Second Defendant (secretary of Kochow Association Malaysia): MOOK TEN LOY
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 7 June 2022
- Case Number
- WA-24NCvC-2242-11/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons / Interlocutory Application — Setting Aside Ex‑parte Interim Injunction (judgment)
- Outcome
- Defendants' application allowed; ex‑parte interim injunction (Order dated 12.11.2021) set aside; costs awarded to defendants; damages to be assessed.
- Legal Topics
- Ex‑parte Interim Injunction, Order 29 R.1(2 C) Rules of Court 2012, Full and Frank Disclosure, Balance of Convenience, Setting Aside Interlocutory Orders
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
WONG KOK LEONG
Plaintiff (committee Member of Kochow Association Malaysia)
FOO CHU JONG
First Defendant (president of Kochow Association Malaysia)
MOOK TEN LOY
Second Defendant (secretary of Kochow Association Malaysia)
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Interlocutory Application — Setting Aside Ex‑parte Interim Injunction (judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an ex‑parte injunction may be granted to stop the holding or progress of an association meeting under O.29 r.1(2C) ROC
- 2 Whether the plaintiff failed to make full and frank disclosure in support of the ex‑parte application
- 3 Whether there is a bona fide serious issue to be tried
Ratio Decidendi
The ex‑parte interim injunction was set aside because O.29 r.1(2C) expressly prohibits granting ex‑parte injunctions that stop the holding or progress of an association meeting; additionally the plaintiff failed to make full and frank disclosure of material facts (knowledge of ROS system migration and internal committee discussions), thereby defeating the entitlement to equitable relief. The defendants' application to set aside the order is allowed with costs and damages to be assessed.
Court Disposition
Defendants' application allowed; ex‑parte interim injunction (Order dated 12.11.2021) set aside; costs awarded to defendants; damages to be assessed.
Orders
- Set aside Order dated 12.11.2021 (Enclosure 12) granting ex‑parte interim injunction
- Defendants' application to set aside the ex‑parte order allowed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment