PEMIUTANG PENGHAKIMAN 1. ) DATUK SERI MAGLIN DENNIS DCRUZ 2. ) DATUK SUBRAYAN A/L SELLAPPAN 3. ) DATO DR LOGA BALA MOHAN A/L JAGANATHAN 4. ) DATO ELAYPPEN A/L MUTHUSAMY 5. ) DATUK MOHAN A/L A KANDASAMY 6. ) DATUK TIONG YAP CHOON 7. ) SATHIA
At the time the bankruptcy notices were issued (23.6.2022) the 30.3.2022 sealed judgment was final and enforceable; the judgment debtors failed to comply with mandatory requirements under s3(2)(ii) IA and r93 IR (no affidavit/particulars within seven days and no quantified counterclaim/set-off), therefore the bankruptcy notices were valid; the debtors are jointly and severally liable for the full judgment sum so the creditors were entitled to issue separate bankruptcy notices against each debtor; the applications to set aside the notices are dismissed with costs subject to allocatur.
- Citation
- WA-29NCC-759-06/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Judgment Creditor: Datuk Seri Maglin Dennis D'Cruz & 11 Ors; Judgment Debtor: Dato Ly Kim Cheong; Judgment Debtor: Tan Sri Datuk Seri M. Kayveas; Judgment Debtor: Datuk Chandrakumanan A/L Arumugam
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 2022
- Case Number
- WA-29NCC-759-06/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Proceeding Under Insolvency Act 1967 / Application Via Summons in Chambers to Set Aside Bankruptcy Notices; Heard and Dismissed at Interlocutory Stage
- Outcome
- Applications to set aside the bankruptcy notices dismissed with costs subject to allocatur.
- Legal Topics
- Final Judgment, Bankruptcy Notice (s3 Ia), Joint and Several Liability, Stay of Execution, Set Aside/invalidating Bankruptcy Notice, Procedural Compliance With Insolvency Rules
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Datuk Seri Maglin Dennis D'Cruz & 11 Ors
Judgment Creditor
Dato Ly Kim Cheong
Judgment Debtor
Tan Sri Datuk Seri M. Kayveas
Judgment Debtor
Datuk Chandrakumanan A/L Arumugam
Judgment Debtor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Proceeding Under Insolvency Act 1967 / Application Via Summons in Chambers to Set Aside Bankruptcy Notices; Heard and Dismissed at Interlocutory Stage
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judgment dated 30.03.2022 was a final judgment within the meaning of s3(1)(i) Insolvency Act 1967
- 2 Whether the amounts claimed in the bankruptcy notices were excessive or incorrect and therefore the notices should be set aside
- 3 Whether the debtors complied with s3(2)(ii) IA and r93 IR by filing particulars/affidavit within seven days to challenge the bankruptcy notices
Ratio Decidendi
At the time the bankruptcy notices were issued (23.6.2022) the 30.3.2022 sealed judgment was final and enforceable; the judgment debtors failed to comply with mandatory requirements under s3(2)(ii) IA and r93 IR (no affidavit/particulars within seven days and no quantified counterclaim/set-off), therefore the bankruptcy notices were valid; the debtors are jointly and severally liable for the full judgment sum so the creditors were entitled to issue separate bankruptcy notices against each debtor; the applications to set aside the notices are dismissed with costs subject to allocatur.
Court Disposition
Applications to set aside the bankruptcy notices dismissed with costs subject to allocatur.
Orders
- Applications in Encl. 5 (WA-29NCC-759-06/2022; WA-29NCC-760-06/2022; WA-29NCC-761-06/2022) dismissed
- Bankruptcy notices dated 23.6.2022 upheld as valid
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment