1. ) DAYANG KARTINI BINTI AWANG BUJANG 2. ) MARDZIANA BINTI CHE MOHD AMIN

1. ) DAYANG KARTINI BINTI AWANG BUJANG 2. ) MARDZIANA BINTI CHE MOHD AMIN

The court held the prosecution proved all elements of forgery under s.468 read with s.463 and established common intention under s.34: P23 was fabricated by OKT2, authorised/endorsed by OKT1 with knowledge services were not supplied, payment was received and diverted, and attempts to manufacture supporting goods afterwards were concealment; conviction and sentence follow.

Citation
CA-61R-4-01/2022 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
Parties
Prosecutor: Pendakwa Raya; Accused (okt1): Dayang Kartini binti Awang Bujang; Accused (okt2): Mardziana binti Che Mohd Amin
Court
Sessions Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
24 December 2025
Case Number
CA-61R-4-01/2022 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
Procedural Posture
Criminal Trial (forgery) / Judgment After Full Trial at End of Defence
Outcome
OKT1 (Dayang Kartini binti Awang Bujang) and OKT2 (Mardziana binti Che Mohd Amin) convicted of forgery under s.468 Penal Code read with s.34; charges proven beyond reasonable doubt.
Legal Topics
Forgery Under S.468 Penal Code, Common Intention Under S.34 Penal Code, Definition of Forgery S.463 Penal Code, Standard of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt, Sentencing Principles and Probation Under S.294 CPC, Forfeiture Under S.40 MACC Act 2009
Source Language
Malay/English
Criminal Law Forgery Public Procurement Law Corruption / Anti‑corruption Evidence Sentencing Forgery Under S.468 Penal Code Common Intention Under S.34 Penal Code +4 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pendakwa Raya

Prosecutor

Dayang Kartini binti Awang Bujang

Accused (okt1)

Mardziana binti Che Mohd Amin

Accused (okt2)

Procedural Posture

Criminal Trial (forgery) / Judgment After Full Trial at End of Defence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether P23 was a forged document used with intent to cheat the Department
  2. 2 Whether the elements of forgery under s.468 read with s.463 were proved beyond reasonable doubt
  3. 3 Whether defendants acted with common intention under s.34

Ratio Decidendi

The court held the prosecution proved all elements of forgery under s.468 read with s.463 and established common intention under s.34: P23 was fabricated by OKT2, authorised/endorsed by OKT1 with knowledge services were not supplied, payment was received and diverted, and attempts to manufacture supporting goods afterwards were concealment; conviction and sentence follow.

Court Disposition

OKT1 (Dayang Kartini binti Awang Bujang) and OKT2 (Mardziana binti Che Mohd Amin) convicted of forgery under s.468 Penal Code read with s.34; charges proven beyond reasonable doubt.

Orders

  • OKT1: Imprisonment 6 months from date of judgment and fine RM10,000; in default of payment six months imprisonment
  • OKT2: Imprisonment 6 months from date of judgment and fine RM10,000; in default of payment six months imprisonment