CHAILEASE BERJAYA CREDIT SDN. BHD. 1. ) MUHAMMAD SYAMSUL ARIFFIN BIN AMAT 2. ) SITI SHAHIRAH BINTI MOHD NOH PIHAK TERKILAN REGION FOOD INDUSTRIES SDN. BHD.
Wages payable under a subsisting contract are debts accruing due within the meaning of Order 49 ROC 2012; therefore a garnishee order may operate on a continuing basis to deduct up to 50% of the judgment debtor's net monthly wages until the judgment sum of RM29,999.69 is satisfied, subject to statutory caps and termination of employment.
- Citation
- WA-A72NCC-1036-01/2025 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Parties
- Judgment Creditor: CHAILEASE BERJAYA CREDIT SDN. BHD.; Judgment Debtor: MUHAMMAD SYAMSUL ARIFFIN BIN AMAT; Judgment Debtor: SITI SHAHIRAH BINTI MOHD NOH; Garnishee: MAYBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD; Garnishee: REGION FOOD INDUSTRIES SDN. BHD.
- Court
- Magistrates' Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 14 August 2025
- Case Number
- WA-A72NCC-1036-01/2025 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Procedural Posture
- Garnishee Proceeding Under Order 49 Rules of Court 2012 / Hearing on Show Cause Order; Court Determination and Garnishee Order Made Absolute
- Outcome
- Garnishee order made absolute; continuing garnishment of 50% of JD1's net monthly salary by G2 until judgment satisfied; costs awarded to G2; order limited by applicable statutory provisions and employment status.
- Legal Topics
- Garnishment, Attachment of Wages, Debtors Act 1957, Employment Act 1955, Order 49 Rules of Court 2012
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHAILEASE BERJAYA CREDIT SDN. BHD.
Judgment Creditor
MUHAMMAD SYAMSUL ARIFFIN BIN AMAT
Judgment Debtor
SITI SHAHIRAH BINTI MOHD NOH
Judgment Debtor
MAYBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD
Garnishee
REGION FOOD INDUSTRIES SDN. BHD.
Garnishee
Procedural Posture
Garnishee Proceeding Under Order 49 Rules of Court 2012 / Hearing on Show Cause Order; Court Determination and Garnishee Order Made Absolute
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether wages payable by the Second Garnishee to JD1 fall within the meaning of 'any debt due or accruing due' under Order 49 ROC 2012
- 2 Whether a garnishee order may operate on a continuing basis against future wages without fresh monthly applications
- 3 Whether the statutory framework permits and limits such deductions
Ratio Decidendi
Wages payable under a subsisting contract are debts accruing due within the meaning of Order 49 ROC 2012; therefore a garnishee order may operate on a continuing basis to deduct up to 50% of the judgment debtor's net monthly wages until the judgment sum of RM29,999.69 is satisfied, subject to statutory caps and termination of employment.
Court Disposition
Garnishee order made absolute; continuing garnishment of 50% of JD1's net monthly salary by G2 until judgment satisfied; costs awarded to G2; order limited by applicable statutory provisions and employment status.
Orders
- The Garnishee Order is made absolute.
- The Second Garnishee (G2) shall deduct 50% of the net monthly salary of JD1, after statutory deductions, and pay the same directly to the Judgment Creditor each month until full satisfaction of the judgment sum of RM29,999.69 (as at 28 February 2025), subject to s.3(1)(f) Debtors Act 1957 and s.24(8) Employment Act...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment