LOK SWEE TIONG LAIN-LAIN LOK SIEW CHOO LOK CHENG HWA @ LOCK SIEW HWA LOCK PEK YEM LOK SIEW HOON … CAVEATORS
Because the probate proceedings were contested and the caveats related to preservation of estate rights pending adjudication, the court refused summary elimination of the caveats and concluded that justice required conversion of the originating summons into a writ action under Order 28 r.8 so that the contested issues including validity of the will and endorsement/pleading requirements under Order 72 can be properly determined.
- Citation
- JB-32NCVC-190-08/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Applicant (executor/propounder): LOK SWEE TIONG; Caveator/intervener: LOK SIEW CHOO; Caveator/intervener: LOK CHENG HWA @ LOCK SIEW HWA; Caveator/intervener: LOCK PEK YEM; Caveator/intervener: LOK SIEW HOON; Caveator/intervener: LOK SWEE LONG; Caveator/intervener: LOCK SIEW LANG @ LOCK SWEE LUAN
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 24 August 2021
- Case Number
- JB-32NCVC-190-08/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Probate (originating Summons) / Interlocutory — Originating Summons Converted to Writ Action by Order Dated 24 Aug 2021
- Outcome
- Originating summons and all interlocutory matters converted to a writ action; matter to proceed under Rules applicable to contentious probate.
- Legal Topics
- Grant of Probate, Caveats and Removal, Conversion of Originating Summons to Writ, Contested Will Procedure, Summary Disposal Under O.71 R.38
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LOK SWEE TIONG
Applicant (executor/propounder)
LOK SIEW CHOO
Caveator/intervener
LOK CHENG HWA @ LOCK SIEW HWA
Caveator/intervener
LOCK PEK YEM
Caveator/intervener
LOK SIEW HOON
Caveator/intervener
LOK SWEE LONG
Caveator/intervener
LOCK SIEW LANG @ LOCK SWEE LUAN
Caveator/intervener
Procedural Posture
Probate (originating Summons) / Interlocutory — Originating Summons Converted to Writ Action by Order Dated 24 Aug 2021
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court can dismiss the caveators'/ interveners' challenge without giving opportunity to be heard
- 2 Whether the originating summons can be dealt with summarily under Order 71 r.38/Order 72
- 3 Whether the originating summons should be converted to a writ action under Order 28 r.8
Ratio Decidendi
Because the probate proceedings were contested and the caveats related to preservation of estate rights pending adjudication, the court refused summary elimination of the caveats and concluded that justice required conversion of the originating summons into a writ action under Order 28 r.8 so that the contested issues including validity of the will and endorsement/pleading requirements under Order 72 can be properly determined.
Court Disposition
Originating summons and all interlocutory matters converted to a writ action; matter to proceed under Rules applicable to contentious probate.
Orders
- Originating Summons and interlocutory matters to continue as if begun by writ pursuant to Order 28 r.8 Rules of Court 2012 (conversion ordered 24 Aug 2021)
- Affidavits filed in the originating summons to stand as pleadings with liberty to amend or apply for particulars as appropriate; no final determination on grant of probate or removal of caveats made at this stage
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment