CHIN YAP YEAT @ CHIN NAM SEUN
The court found the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused voluntarily caused grievous hurt to the elderly victim and that the use of a plastic chair did not attract the special weapon provision of section 324; the accused's self‑defence claim was rejected as fabricated, warranting conviction under section 325 Penal Code and sentencing to imprisonment and fine.
- Citation
- 62-23-02/2017 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Parties
- Prosecution: Pendakwa Raya; Accused: Chin Yap Yeat @ Chin Nam Seun
- Court
- Sessions Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 1 June 2020
- Case Number
- 62-23-02/2017 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Conviction and Sentencing (appeal Filed)
- Outcome
- Accused convicted under section 325 Penal Code; sentenced to 2 years imprisonment and fined RM10,000, default 6 months imprisonment. Execution of sentence of imprisonment was ordered suspended on conditions of bail at time of sentencing.
- Legal Topics
- Grievous Hurt, Voluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt, Use of Weapon, Self Defence, Evidence and Burden of Proof, Sections 320, 324, 325 Penal Code
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pendakwa Raya
Prosecution
Chin Yap Yeat @ Chin Nam Seun
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Conviction and Sentencing (appeal Filed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused voluntarily caused grievous hurt under section 325 Penal Code
- 2 Whether the instrument used (plastic chair) falls within the ambit of section 324 Penal Code
- 3 Whether the accused's claim of self-defence negates criminal liability
Ratio Decidendi
The court found the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused voluntarily caused grievous hurt to the elderly victim and that the use of a plastic chair did not attract the special weapon provision of section 324; the accused's self‑defence claim was rejected as fabricated, warranting conviction under section 325 Penal Code and sentencing to imprisonment and fine.
Court Disposition
Accused convicted under section 325 Penal Code; sentenced to 2 years imprisonment and fined RM10,000, default 6 months imprisonment. Execution of sentence of imprisonment was ordered suspended on conditions of bail at time of sentencing.
Orders
- Accused found guilty and convicted under section 325 Penal Code
- Sentence: imprisonment for 2 years from date of judgment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment