MOHD FAIZUL BIN RAZAK

MOHD FAIZUL BIN RAZAK

Accused's voluntary guilty pleas and admitted facts and exhibits established elements of all charged offences; mitigating factors considered but outweighed by seriousness, risk to public and need for deterrence; appropriate sentences (custodial and fines) were lawfully imposed and are to run concurrently from date of arrest.

Citation
DJ-83-127-02/2026 (Mahkamah Majistret)
Parties
Prosecution: Pendakwa Raya; Defendant/accused: Mohd Faizul bin Razak
Court
Magistrates' Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
23 February 2026
Case Number
DJ-83-127-02/2026 (Mahkamah Majistret)
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Conviction and Sentencing (magistrate's Court)
Outcome
Accused convicted on guilty pleas; sentences imposed and to run concurrently from date of arrest; fines with default imprisonment as specified.
Legal Topics
Housebreaking (section 457), Criminal Intimidation (section 506), Bodily Hurt (section 323/326 A), Obstruction of Public Servant (section 186), Possession of Imitation Firearm (section 36(1) Firearms Act 1960), Guilty Plea; Mitigation and Sentencing
Source Language
Malay/English
Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Weapons Law Domestic/family Violence Sentencing Housebreaking (section 457) Criminal Intimidation (section 506) Bodily Hurt (section 323/326 A) +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pendakwa Raya

Prosecution

Mohd Faizul bin Razak

Defendant/accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Conviction and Sentencing (magistrate's Court)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Validity and effect of guilty plea under s.305 Kanun Tatacara Jenayah
  2. 2 Appropriate sentence balancing mitigation and aggravation
  3. 3 Public interest and deterrence as sentencing considerations

Ratio Decidendi

Accused's voluntary guilty pleas and admitted facts and exhibits established elements of all charged offences; mitigating factors considered but outweighed by seriousness, risk to public and need for deterrence; appropriate sentences (custodial and fines) were lawfully imposed and are to run concurrently from date of arrest.

Court Disposition

Accused convicted on guilty pleas; sentences imposed and to run concurrently from date of arrest; fines with default imprisonment as specified.

Orders

  • Charge under s.457 Kanun Keseksaan: 2 years imprisonment from date of arrest and a fine of RM10000 in default 2 years imprisonment.
  • Charge under s.506 Kanun Keseksaan: 5 years imprisonment from date of arrest.