MENARA ONE PLANTATION SDN BHD 1. ) MENTERI KEMENTERIAN PERDAGANGAN DALAM NEGERI, KOPERASI DAN KEPENGGUNAAN 2. ) KEMENTERIAN PERDAGANGAN DALAM NEGERI, KOPERASI DAN KEPENGGUNAAN NEGERI KELANTAN 3. ) Kementerian Perdagangan Dalam Negeri dan Ha
The court held the withdrawal of the subsidy quota was an administrative policy decision under the Cooking Oil Stabilization Scheme, non‑justiciable and not made in breach of law, irrationality or procedural impropriety; the applicant had agreed to terms permitting withdrawal without reasons and therefore had no legitimate expectation or legal right to the quota; application dismissed.
- Citation
- DA-25-7-08/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Pemohon: Menara One Plantation Sdn Bhd; Responden 1: Menteri Perdagangan Dalam Negeri, Koperasi dan Kepenggunaan Malaysia; Responden 2: Kementerian Perdagangan Dalam Negeri, Koperasi dan Kepenggunaan Negeri Kelantan; Responden 3: Kementerian Perdagangan Dalam Negeri, Koperasi dan Kepenggunaan Malaysia; Responden 4: Kerajaan Malaysia
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2022
- Case Number
- DA-25-7-08/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Semakan Kehakiman (judicial Review) / High Court Judgment (final)
- Outcome
- Permohonan ditolak (application dismissed)
- Legal Topics
- Illegality, Irrationality (wednesbury Unreasonableness), Procedural Impropriety, Justiciability, Legitimate Expectation, Estoppel, Statutory Interpretation
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Menara One Plantation Sdn Bhd
Pemohon
Menteri Perdagangan Dalam Negeri, Koperasi dan Kepenggunaan Malaysia
Responden 1
Kementerian Perdagangan Dalam Negeri, Koperasi dan Kepenggunaan Negeri Kelantan
Responden 2
Kementerian Perdagangan Dalam Negeri, Koperasi dan Kepenggunaan Malaysia
Responden 3
Kerajaan Malaysia
Responden 4
Procedural Posture
Semakan Kehakiman (judicial Review) / High Court Judgment (final)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether withdrawal of subsidy quota was illegal, irrational or procedurally improper
- 2 Whether the decision to withdraw quota was justiciable or a non‑justiciable policy decision
- 3 Whether the applicant had a legitimate expectation or was estopped from having relief
Ratio Decidendi
The court held the withdrawal of the subsidy quota was an administrative policy decision under the Cooking Oil Stabilization Scheme, non‑justiciable and not made in breach of law, irrationality or procedural impropriety; the applicant had agreed to terms permitting withdrawal without reasons and therefore had no legitimate expectation or legal right to the quota; application dismissed.
Court Disposition
Permohonan ditolak (application dismissed)
Orders
- Application dismissed
- No declaration or mandamus granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment