BUDAYA YNS SDN BHD REMBAU GALIAN SDN BHD
The Sand Excavation Agreements, properly construed, created a licence and agency arrangement permitting plaintiffs to occupy and extract sand as agent/licensee of the Malay landowner; they did not transfer, charge or otherwise dispose of a Malay holding within the meaning of the Malay Reservation Enactment, and therefore were not void. The defendant breached clause 2 by failing to execute documents to obtain permits and was obliged to return the RM200,000 security deposits to each plaintiff with interest at 5% per annum from 1 March 2017. The defendant's counterclaim for trespass succeeded only to the extent of nominal damages (RM1,000) because loss was not proved. Appellate intervention...
- Citation
- NA-12BNCC-3-07/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Budaya YNS Sdn Bhd; Respondent/plaintiff: Rembau Galian Sdn Bhd; Respondent/plaintiff: Permata Ketara Sdn Bhd; Respondent/plaintiff: Pedas Galian Sdn Bhd
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 2023
- Case Number
- NA-12BNCC-3-07/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal From Sessions Court (contract and Land Disputes) / High Court Judgment on Appeal (final Disposition)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part and dismissed in part: the High Court affirmed that the Sand Excavation Agreements were not void and that the defendant must return deposits with interest; the defendant's appeal on the counterclaim for trespass was allowed to the extent of nominal damages; other grounds of appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Illegality Under Contracts Act S24, Malay Reservation Enactment S8/s19, Licence Versus Lease, Trespass (occupational Trespass), Security Deposit and Set Off, Interest on Deposits, Nominal Damages, Appellate Review of Findings of Fact
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Budaya YNS Sdn Bhd
Appellant/defendant
Rembau Galian Sdn Bhd
Respondent/plaintiff
Permata Ketara Sdn Bhd
Respondent/plaintiff
Pedas Galian Sdn Bhd
Respondent/plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal From Sessions Court (contract and Land Disputes) / High Court Judgment on Appeal (final Disposition)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Sand Excavation Agreements were illegal and void under section 24 Contracts Act 1950 by contravening section 19 of the Malay Reservation Enactment
- 2 Whether the agreements transferred, charged or otherwise disposed of a Malay holding (section 8)
- 3 Whether the defendant breached clause 2 by failing to execute documents for permits
Ratio Decidendi
The Sand Excavation Agreements, properly construed, created a licence and agency arrangement permitting plaintiffs to occupy and extract sand as agent/licensee of the Malay landowner; they did not transfer, charge or otherwise dispose of a Malay holding within the meaning of the Malay Reservation Enactment, and therefore were not void. The defendant breached clause 2 by failing to execute documents to obtain permits and was obliged to return the RM200,000 security deposits to each plaintiff with interest at 5% per annum from 1 March 2017. The defendant's counterclaim for trespass succeeded only to the extent of nominal damages (RM1,000) because loss was not proved. Appellate intervention...
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part and dismissed in part: the High Court affirmed that the Sand Excavation Agreements were not void and that the defendant must return deposits with interest; the defendant's appeal on the counterclaim for trespass was allowed to the extent of nominal damages; other grounds of appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Budaya YNS Sdn Bhd to repay each plaintiff RM200000 (security deposit) together with interest at 5.0 per cent per annum from 1 March 2017 until payment
- Permata Ketara Sdn Bhd, Rembau Galian Sdn Bhd and Pedas Galian Sdn Bhd to deliver payment of recovered deposits as ordered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment