SHAHRUL KAMAR BIN MOHAMED SHAHARUDDIN
Court accepted prosecution's evidence (CCTV authenticated in court, medical evidence of hymen tears, consistent witness testimony) established the elements of incest/rape and assault beyond a reasonable doubt; defence explanations were rejected as insufficient to create reasonable doubt, therefore accused convicted on all five charges.
- Citation
- AC-62JS-3-02/2021 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Parties
- Prosecution: PENDAKWA RAYA; Accused: Shahrul Kamar bin Mohamed Shaharuddin
- Court
- Sessions Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 1 August 2025
- Case Number
- AC-62JS-3-02/2021 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sexual Offences (incest, Rape and Assault) / Trial Concluded; Conviction and Sentencing in Sessions Court
- Outcome
- Accused convicted on five counts and sentenced
- Legal Topics
- Incest, Rape, Sexual Assault, Admissibility of Electronic Evidence, Vulnerable Victims, Concurrent Sentencing
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PENDAKWA RAYA
Prosecution
Shahrul Kamar bin Mohamed Shaharuddin
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sexual Offences (incest, Rape and Assault) / Trial Concluded; Conviction and Sentencing in Sessions Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether prosecution proved a prima facie case for incest/rape and assault
- 2 Whether the CCTV recording and CD evidence were authentic and admissible
- 3 Whether the victim's mental disability affected consent and proof of offence
Ratio Decidendi
Court accepted prosecution's evidence (CCTV authenticated in court, medical evidence of hymen tears, consistent witness testimony) established the elements of incest/rape and assault beyond a reasonable doubt; defence explanations were rejected as insufficient to create reasonable doubt, therefore accused convicted on all five charges.
Court Disposition
Accused convicted on five counts and sentenced
Orders
- Convicted and sentenced on five counts as follows: three counts under Seksyen 376B Kanun Keseksaan (AC-62JS-2-02/2021 counts 1-3) — each 30 years' imprisonment and 2 strokes of the rotan from date of conviction (1 August 2025)
- One count under Seksyen 376B Kanun Keseksaan (AC-62JS-3-02/2021 count 1) — 30 years' imprisonment and 2 strokes of the rotan from date of conviction (1 August 2025)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment