Lembaga Hasil Dalam Negeri - Cawangan Guaman Lembah Klang 1. ) TMT Industry Sdn Bhd 2. ) Mo, Yu Hui 3. ) Chan, Hsun-Wei 4. ) Md Hanif bin Othman
Because s.106(3) ITA 1967 precludes the High Court from entertaining challenges to the assessed amount in civil recovery proceedings and s.75A makes directors jointly and severally liable where the company is liable, the court was bound to enter summary judgment for the Government; merits of assessment must be pursued before the SCIT, not in the civil suit.
- Citation
- WA-21NCVC-5-01/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant / Defendant: TMT INDUSTRY SDN BHD; Appellant / Defendant: MOU, YU-HUI; Appellant / Defendant: CHAN, HSUN-WEI; Appellant / Defendant: MD HANIF BIN OTHMAN; Respondent / Plaintiff: KERJAAN MALAYSIA
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 15 August 2022
- Case Number
- WA-21NCVC-5-01/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Tax Recovery / Appeal From High Court Interlocutory Summary Judgment
- Outcome
- Summary judgment entered for the Plaintiff in the High Court; Defendants held liable; order in terms granted
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax Recovery, Summary Judgment (order 14 ROC 2012), Directors' Liability Under S.75 a ITA 1967, Special Commissioner of Income Tax (scit) Appeals, Section 106(3) ITA 1967
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TMT INDUSTRY SDN BHD
Appellant / Defendant
MOU, YU-HUI
Appellant / Defendant
CHAN, HSUN-WEI
Appellant / Defendant
MD HANIF BIN OTHMAN
Appellant / Defendant
KERJAAN MALAYSIA
Respondent / Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Civil Tax Recovery / Appeal From High Court Interlocutory Summary Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether summary judgment under Order 14 ROC 2012 applies in tax recovery proceedings
- 2 Whether defendants can raise triable issues to resist summary judgment in tax recovery proceedings
- 3 Whether directors are personally liable for company tax under s.75A ITA 1967 after winding up
Ratio Decidendi
Because s.106(3) ITA 1967 precludes the High Court from entertaining challenges to the assessed amount in civil recovery proceedings and s.75A makes directors jointly and severally liable where the company is liable, the court was bound to enter summary judgment for the Government; merits of assessment must be pursued before the SCIT, not in the civil suit.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment entered for the Plaintiff in the High Court; Defendants held liable; order in terms granted
Orders
- Summary judgment entered against the Defendants
- Order in terms granted in favour of the Plaintiff
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment