Top ATC Industries Sdn Bhd Cheok Lam Chuan
D5 and D6 were subsequent purchasers but failed to discharge the burden of proving they were bona fide purchasers for valuable consideration given the highly suspicious timing of transfers, absence of credible proof of payment and inadequate due diligence; therefore they are deprived of the shield of indefeasibility under the proviso to s.340(3) NLC. The High Court orders restoring title to the Plaintiff are affirmed except the award of aggravated damages, which was set aside for lack of pleading.
- Citation
- N-01(NCvC)(W)-56-02/2023 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Respondent / Plaintiff: Cheok Lam Chuan; Appellant (5th Defendant): TOP ATC Industries Sdn Bhd; Appellant (6th Defendant): Lee Kok Chian; 1st Defendant: Fu Zhi Mao Group Sdn. Bhd.; 2nd Defendant: Thana Balan A/L Rajamanickam; 3rd Defendant: Abdullah Zubair Chan bin Abdullah; 4th Defendant: Theselim Begam bin Mohd Yusoff; 7th Defendant (registrar of Titles): Pendaftar Hakmilik Negeri Sembilan; 8th Defendant (director of Lands and Mines): Pengarah Tanah dan Galian Negeri Sembilan
- Court
- NCvC
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2025
- Case Number
- N-01(NCvC)(W)-56-02/2023 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (property/land) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeals From High Court Trial Decision
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed except insofar as aggravated damages are set aside; High Court judgment affirmed in all other respects
- Legal Topics
- Indefeasibility of Title, Bona Fide Purchaser for Value, National Land Code S340, Fraudulent Transfer, Conveyancing Practice, Aggravated Damages, Registrar/land Office Negligence
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cheok Lam Chuan
Respondent / Plaintiff
TOP ATC Industries Sdn Bhd
Appellant (5th Defendant)
Lee Kok Chian
Appellant (6th Defendant)
Fu Zhi Mao Group Sdn. Bhd.
1st Defendant
Thana Balan A/L Rajamanickam
2nd Defendant
Abdullah Zubair Chan bin Abdullah
3rd Defendant
Theselim Begam bin Mohd Yusoff
4th Defendant
Pendaftar Hakmilik Negeri Sembilan
7th Defendant (registrar of Titles)
Pengarah Tanah dan Galian Negeri Sembilan
8th Defendant (director of Lands and Mines)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (property/land) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeals From High Court Trial Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellants (D5 and D6) were bona fide purchasers for valuable consideration
- 2 Whether D5 and D6 obtained indefeasible title under the proviso to s.340(3) of the National Land Code given antecedent fraud
- 3 Whether D5 was an immediate purchaser or a subsequent purchaser
Ratio Decidendi
D5 and D6 were subsequent purchasers but failed to discharge the burden of proving they were bona fide purchasers for valuable consideration given the highly suspicious timing of transfers, absence of credible proof of payment and inadequate due diligence; therefore they are deprived of the shield of indefeasibility under the proviso to s.340(3) NLC. The High Court orders restoring title to the Plaintiff are affirmed except the award of aggravated damages, which was set aside for lack of pleading.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed except insofar as aggravated damages are set aside; High Court judgment affirmed in all other respects
Orders
- High Court order dated 10 January 2023 affirmed except the order awarding aggravated damages to the Plaintiff which is set aside
- Registration of the subject title and consequential orders of the High Court (cancellation of D6 registration and re-transfer of title to the Plaintiff by D7/D8; negligence findings as to D7/D8) are affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment