1. ) TAN YAN SHIN 2. ) JEFFREY MAH WENG KAI INTERCONTINENTAL MUSHROOM FARMING SDN BHD PIHAK YANG MENUNTUT Natural Mushroom Sdn Bhd
The interpleader must be confined to determining ownership of the seized goods; the EC failed to particularise allegations of fraud or to adducesufficient evidence to rebut the Claimant's documentary and possession evidence. No triable issue was established that would justify converting the interpleader into a full trial. On the balance of probabilities the Claimant proved ownership; accordingly the interpleader is to be disposed summarily in favour of the Claimant and EC's summons for directions (encl.52) is dismissed.
- Citation
- BD-56WSL-8-04/2025 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Parties
- Execution Creditor: Tan Yan Shin; Execution Creditor: Jeffrey Mah Weng Kai; Execution Debtor: Intercontinental Mushroom Farming Sdn Bhd; Claimant: Natural Mushroom Sdn Bhd
- Court
- Sessions Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 10 October 2025
- Case Number
- BD-56WSL-8-04/2025 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Procedural Posture
- Execution Proceedings With Interpleader Dispute / Grounds of Judgment on Summons for Directions and Interpleader (decision)
- Outcome
- Interpleader (encl.51) allowed; Summons for Directions (encl.52) dismissed; seized goods released to Claimant; writ of seizure and sale struck out and auction vacated; execution deposit returned to Execution Creditor subject to bailiff costs; costs awarded to Claimant.
- Legal Topics
- Interpleader (order 17), Writ of Seizure and Sale, Conversion to Trial, Burden of Proof, Phoenix Company Allegation, Particulars of Fraud, Jurisdictional Limits of Interpleader
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tan Yan Shin
Execution Creditor
Jeffrey Mah Weng Kai
Execution Creditor
Intercontinental Mushroom Farming Sdn Bhd
Execution Debtor
Natural Mushroom Sdn Bhd
Claimant
Procedural Posture
Execution Proceedings With Interpleader Dispute / Grounds of Judgment on Summons for Directions and Interpleader (decision)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether interpleader proceedings should be converted into a full trial to determine alleged phoenix company/fraud issues
- 2 Whether the Claimant is the lawful owner of the goods seized from the premises
- 3 Whether the Court has jurisdiction under O.17 to determine matters beyond ownership of seized goods
Ratio Decidendi
The interpleader must be confined to determining ownership of the seized goods; the EC failed to particularise allegations of fraud or to adducesufficient evidence to rebut the Claimant's documentary and possession evidence. No triable issue was established that would justify converting the interpleader into a full trial. On the balance of probabilities the Claimant proved ownership; accordingly the interpleader is to be disposed summarily in favour of the Claimant and EC's summons for directions (encl.52) is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Interpleader (encl.51) allowed; Summons for Directions (encl.52) dismissed; seized goods released to Claimant; writ of seizure and sale struck out and auction vacated; execution deposit returned to Execution Creditor subject to bailiff costs; costs awarded to Claimant.
Orders
- Encl.52 (Summons for Directions) dismissed with costs of MYR2000 to Claimant
- Encl.51 (Notice of Interpleader) allowed; goods seized from No.8 Jalan Industri BRJ 2, Taman Industri Bukit Rawang Jaya 2, Rawang released and returned to Natural Mushroom Sdn Bhd
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment