MOHD. NAZRUL BIN MOHD. BASRI PENCELAH FARAHZATULL BINTI ABDUL RAHMAN

MOHD. NAZRUL BIN MOHD. BASRI PENCELAH FARAHZATULL BINTI ABDUL RAHMAN

The court allowed the proposed intervener to be added because she has a direct legal interest that would be affected, and set aside the ex‑parte order dated 21.8.2024 because the applicant failed to disclose material competing facts (existence of other heirs and ongoing disputes), thereby amounting to misuse of the court process; the substantive originating summons is remitted for rehearing.

Citation
BA-24NCvC-1461-07/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Parties
Applicant / Pemohon: Mohd. Nazrul bin Mohd. Basri; Proposed Intervener / Pencelah Yang Dicadangkan: Farahzatull binti Abdul Rahman; Person Alleged Mentally Disordered / Subject: Mohd Basri @ Mohd Noh bin Badut
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
29 July 2025
Case Number
BA-24NCvC-1461-07/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons (saman Pemula) Under Mental Health Act 2001 and National Land Code 1965 / Intervention Application Allowed; Ex Parte Order Set Aside; Matter Relisted for Full Hearing (re Scheduled)
Outcome
Intervention allowed; ex‑parte order dated 21.8.2024 set aside; originating summons relisted for rehearing on 29.10.2025; costs awarded to intervener.
Legal Topics
Intervention / Joinder, Ex‑parte Orders, Set Aside for Non‑disclosure / Abuse of Process, Appointment of Committee Under Mental Health Act, Undisclosed Competing Claims, Costs
Source Language
Malay/English
Mental Health Act Civil Procedure Land Law Equity & Trusts Intervention / Joinder Ex‑parte Orders Set Aside for Non‑disclosure / Abuse of Process Appointment of Committee Under Mental Health Act +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mohd. Nazrul bin Mohd. Basri

Applicant / Pemohon

Farahzatull binti Abdul Rahman

Proposed Intervener / Pencelah Yang Dicadangkan

Mohd Basri @ Mohd Noh bin Badut

Person Alleged Mentally Disordered / Subject

Procedural Posture

Originating Summons (saman Pemula) Under Mental Health Act 2001 and National Land Code 1965 / Intervention Application Allowed; Ex Parte Order Set Aside; Matter Relisted for Full Hearing (re Scheduled)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the proposed intervener should be permitted to intervene
  2. 2 Whether the ex‑parte order dated 21.8.2024 should be set aside for material non‑disclosure and abuse of process
  3. 3 Whether the originating proceedings under s52 AKM were for the patient’s welfare or for a private purpose

Ratio Decidendi

The court allowed the proposed intervener to be added because she has a direct legal interest that would be affected, and set aside the ex‑parte order dated 21.8.2024 because the applicant failed to disclose material competing facts (existence of other heirs and ongoing disputes), thereby amounting to misuse of the court process; the substantive originating summons is remitted for rehearing.

Court Disposition

Intervention allowed; ex‑parte order dated 21.8.2024 set aside; originating summons relisted for rehearing on 29.10.2025; costs awarded to intervener.

Orders

  • Proposed intervener (Bakal Pencelah) is allowed to intervene and be added as a party to the originating summons
  • Perintah Mahkamah bertarikh 21.8.2024 is set aside