SITI MARIAM BTE ABU BAKAR PENCELAH SITI ZUBAIDAH BINTI ABU BAKAR @ SUZIE ZUBAIDAH O NEILL
Permission to intervene was granted because the proposed intervener is prima facie a lawful heir whose legal rights in respect of the estate may be directly affected, there are contested issues as to the full list of assets and liabilities, and her participation is necessary to ensure a complete and effectual administration of the estate; the court considered necessity of joinder at interlocutory stage without deciding merits.
- Citation
- JA-31NCvC-494-04/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Pemohon: Siti Mariam bte Abu Bakar; Pencelah (dicadangkan): Siti Zubaidah binti Abu Bakar @ Suzie Zubaidah O'Neill
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 28 August 2025
- Case Number
- JA-31NCvC-494-04/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Probate and Estate Administration (application for Appointment of Administrator) / Interlocutory Application to Be Added as Party (application Under Order 15 Rule 6(2)(b) KKM 2012); Decision on Intervention Application
- Outcome
- Application to intervene allowed; proposed intervener ordered to be added as a party; application for appointment as joint administrator to be heard together with main proceeding; costs to be paid from the estate of the deceased.
- Legal Topics
- Intervention/joinder, Appointment of Administrators, Estate Asset Disclosure, Conflict of Interest
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Siti Mariam bte Abu Bakar
Pemohon
Siti Zubaidah binti Abu Bakar @ Suzie Zubaidah O'Neill
Pencelah (dicadangkan)
Procedural Posture
Probate and Estate Administration (application for Appointment of Administrator) / Interlocutory Application to Be Added as Party (application Under Order 15 Rule 6(2)(b) KKM 2012); Decision on Intervention Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission to intervene under Order 15 Rule 6(2)(b) Kaedah‑Kaedah Mahkamah 2012 should be granted
- 2 Whether the proposed intervener's legal rights as an heir would be directly affected by orders in the main proceedings
- 3 Whether the presence of the proposed intervener is necessary to ensure complete determination of matters in dispute (including disputed assets)
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to intervene was granted because the proposed intervener is prima facie a lawful heir whose legal rights in respect of the estate may be directly affected, there are contested issues as to the full list of assets and liabilities, and her participation is necessary to ensure a complete and effectual administration of the estate; the court considered necessity of joinder at interlocutory stage without deciding merits.
Court Disposition
Application to intervene allowed; proposed intervener ordered to be added as a party; application for appointment as joint administrator to be heard together with main proceeding; costs to be paid from the estate of the deceased.
Orders
- Permission granted for the proposed intervener (Kandungan 15 perenggan (a)) to be added as a party; cause papers to be amended accordingly.
- Application in Kandungan 15 perenggan (b) for appointment as joint administrator to be heard together with Kandungan 1.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment