KAMALAH DEVI A/P MUKAN (NO. K/P : 450621-10-5488) 1. ) AMAKUMAR A/L G. SUMARIAN (NO. K/P : 810703-08-5843) 2. ) SANTHIRASEKARAN A/L SINNASAMY (NO. K.P : 550801-10-6291) 3. ) LACHMY A/P VATUMALAY (NO. K/P : 720202-10-5448)
The court held that the statutory definition of "issue" in section 3 of the Distribution Act 1958 includes descendants of deceased children and that, read together, sections 6(1)(c), 6(1)(h) and 7(1) entitle descendants of predeceased children who survive the intestate to inherit by representation; therefore the applicant's claim to exclude such descendants failed and the originating summons was dismissed.
- Citation
- WA-24NCVC-2323-11/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant/applicant: KAMALAH DEVI A/P MUKAN; Respondent/defendant: AMAKUMAR A/L G. SUMARIAN; Respondent/defendant: SANTHIRASEKARAN A/L SINNASAMY; Respondent/defendant: LACHMY A/P VATUMALAY; Deceased/estate: KARUPAYE A/L KALANGGAN (deceased)
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 6 July 2020
- Case Number
- WA-24NCVC-2323-11/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (probate and Administration) / Appeal From High Court Decision Dismissing Originating Summons
- Outcome
- Originating summons dismissed; applicant's claims rejected
- Legal Topics
- Intestacy, Interpretation of "issue" Under Distribution Act 1958, Statutory Trusts Under Section 7
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
KAMALAH DEVI A/P MUKAN
Appellant/applicant
AMAKUMAR A/L G. SUMARIAN
Respondent/defendant
SANTHIRASEKARAN A/L SINNASAMY
Respondent/defendant
LACHMY A/P VATUMALAY
Respondent/defendant
KARUPAYE A/L KALANGGAN (deceased)
Deceased/estate
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (probate and Administration) / Appeal From High Court Decision Dismissing Originating Summons
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the term "issue" under section 3 of the Distribution Act 1958 includes descendants of deceased children and thus entitles them to inherit
- 2 Whether only children alive at the intestate's death are entitled under section 6(1)(c) or whether descendants of predeceased children (grandchildren) who survive the intestate take by representation under section 7(1)
- 3 Whether the applicant's claim to exclude descendants of predeceased children is sustainable
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the statutory definition of "issue" in section 3 of the Distribution Act 1958 includes descendants of deceased children and that, read together, sections 6(1)(c), 6(1)(h) and 7(1) entitle descendants of predeceased children who survive the intestate to inherit by representation; therefore the applicant's claim to exclude such descendants failed and the originating summons was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Originating summons dismissed; applicant's claims rejected
Orders
- Originating summons (Kandungan 1) dismissed
- Costs to be borne by the estate of the deceased (Harta Pusaka Si Mati)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment