LING SOON PING 1. ) KOPERASI PEMBANGUNAN PENDIDIKAN BHD 2. ) UNIVERSAL TRUSTEE (M) BERHAD
The dispute falls outside section 82 because the second respondent is not a co-operative society and the reliefs sought (declaration of breach of trust and damages for breach of fiduciary duties) are not within the Commission's remedial scope; the claims against both respondents are intertwined; however the Sessions Court is barred by section 69(e) of the Subordinate Courts Act 1948 from adjudicating matters to enforce trusts, therefore the Sessions Court lacked jurisdiction and the appeal is dismissed with the proper forum being the High Court.
- Citation
- BA-12A-25-04/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant/plaintiff: Ling Soon Ping; First Respondent/defendant: Koperasi Pembangunan Pendidikan Berhad; Second Respondent/defendant: Universal Trustee (M) Berhad
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 24 September 2024
- Case Number
- BA-12A-25-04/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sessions Court Decision Striking Out Writ Under Order 18 Rule 19(1) Rules of Court 2012
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction, Striking Out, Enforcement of Trusts, Section 82 Co Operative Societies Act 1993, Section 69(e) Subordinate Courts Act 1948
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ling Soon Ping
Appellant/plaintiff
Koperasi Pembangunan Pendidikan Berhad
First Respondent/defendant
Universal Trustee (M) Berhad
Second Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sessions Court Decision Striking Out Writ Under Order 18 Rule 19(1) Rules of Court 2012
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the dispute falls within the jurisdiction of the Malaysia Co-operative Societies Commission under section 82 Co-operative Societies Act 1993
- 2 Whether the Sessions Court has jurisdiction to hear the dispute notwithstanding section 69(e) Subordinate Courts Act 1948 which bars enforcement of trusts
Ratio Decidendi
The dispute falls outside section 82 because the second respondent is not a co-operative society and the reliefs sought (declaration of breach of trust and damages for breach of fiduciary duties) are not within the Commission's remedial scope; the claims against both respondents are intertwined; however the Sessions Court is barred by section 69(e) of the Subordinate Courts Act 1948 from adjudicating matters to enforce trusts, therefore the Sessions Court lacked jurisdiction and the appeal is dismissed with the proper forum being the High Court.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- No order as to costs; each party to bear own costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment