NORTHERN GREEN VENTURES SDN BHD PENTADBIR TANAH DAERAH HULU LANGAT
The LA conducted a proper full enquiry and reasonably adopted the Applicant's valuer's market valuation; paragraph 4(a) of the First Schedule prevents the Applicant from obtaining an award in excess of the amount it claimed at the enquiry; the Applicant failed to discharge the burden of proving the LA's award was inadequate; severance and injurious affection were warranted for Plot A and increased to 25% as assessed by the court's assessor, but claims for loss of development potential, bridge costs and consequential losses were dismissed for lack of planning approval, presence of TNB pylons and insufficient evidence.
- Citation
- BA-15-154-07/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- PEMOHON: Northern Green Ventures Sdn Bhd; RESPONDEN: Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Hulu Langat
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 21 September 2020
- Case Number
- BA-15-154-07/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Land Reference Under Land Acquisition Act 1960 / Judgment (grounds of Judgment)
- Outcome
- Applicant's challenge to market value award dismissed and LA's market value award (RM5,980,635.15) upheld; award for severance and injurious affection increased (Plot A) to the 25% figure assessed by the court's assessor; claims for loss of development potential, bridge construction costs and consequential losses...
- Legal Topics
- Land Acquisition, Market Value Assessment, Injurious Affection, Severance, Procedure of Land Administrator, Assessment of Costs and Consequential Losses, Interest on Compensation
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Northern Green Ventures Sdn Bhd
PEMOHON
Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Hulu Langat
RESPONDEN
Procedural Posture
Land Reference Under Land Acquisition Act 1960 / Judgment (grounds of Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Land Administrator conducted a full inquiry and correctly determined market value
- 2 Whether paragraph 4(a) of the First Schedule bars the Applicant from obtaining an award in excess of its claimed valuation
- 3 Whether the Applicant is entitled to damages for injurious affection and severance and the proper quantum including claim for bridge costs
Ratio Decidendi
The LA conducted a proper full enquiry and reasonably adopted the Applicant's valuer's market valuation; paragraph 4(a) of the First Schedule prevents the Applicant from obtaining an award in excess of the amount it claimed at the enquiry; the Applicant failed to discharge the burden of proving the LA's award was inadequate; severance and injurious affection were warranted for Plot A and increased to 25% as assessed by the court's assessor, but claims for loss of development potential, bridge costs and consequential losses were dismissed for lack of planning approval, presence of TNB pylons and insufficient evidence.
Court Disposition
Applicant's challenge to market value award dismissed and LA's market value award (RM5,980,635.15) upheld; award for severance and injurious affection increased (Plot A) to the 25% figure assessed by the court's assessor; claims for loss of development potential, bridge construction costs and consequential losses...
Orders
- Land Administrator's market value award for the acquired portion upheld
- Severance and injurious affection award increased to the level assessed for Plot A (25%) as adopted by the court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment