PERBADANAN KEMAJUAN IKTISAD NEGERI KELANTAN NA’AIMAH BINTI MUDA (NO. K/P: 550131-03-5120) PENGARAH TANAH DAN GALIAN NEGERI KELANTAN
The application to intervene was dismissed because the Applicant failed to state the required intitulement (a fatal procedural defect) and, substantively, intervention under O.15 r.6 is inappropriate in land reference proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act 1960 where the statutory route (Form N) is the exclusive method for interested parties to participate; permitting intervention would be an abuse of process.
- Citation
- DA-15-21-10/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- PERAYU: NA’AIMAH BINTI MUDA; PERAYU: MOHD SAIFUL AZHAR BIN ISMAIL; PERAYU: AB KADIR BIN HUSAIN; RESPONDEN: PENGARAH TANAH DAN GALIAN NEGERI KELANTAN; PEMOHON: PERBADANAN KEMAJUAN IKTISAD NEGERI KELANTAN
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2021
- Case Number
- DA-15-21-10/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Land Reference Under the Land Acquisition Act 1960 / Interlocutory Application to Intervene Under O.15 R.6 ROC 2012 Heard and Determined
- Outcome
- Application to intervene dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Land Acquisition, Intervention in Proceedings, Form N/form O Procedure, Abuse of Process, Costs
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NA’AIMAH BINTI MUDA
PERAYU
MOHD SAIFUL AZHAR BIN ISMAIL
PERAYU
AB KADIR BIN HUSAIN
PERAYU
PENGARAH TANAH DAN GALIAN NEGERI KELANTAN
RESPONDEN
PERBADANAN KEMAJUAN IKTISAD NEGERI KELANTAN
PEMOHON
Procedural Posture
Land Reference Under the Land Acquisition Act 1960 / Interlocutory Application to Intervene Under O.15 R.6 ROC 2012 Heard and Determined
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Applicant may intervene under O.15 r.6 Rules of Court 2012 in a land reference under the Land Acquisition Act 1960
- 2 Whether late filing of an affidavit in reply invalidates the affidavit or proceedings
- 3 Whether failure to state the required intitulement is fatal to the application
Ratio Decidendi
The application to intervene was dismissed because the Applicant failed to state the required intitulement (a fatal procedural defect) and, substantively, intervention under O.15 r.6 is inappropriate in land reference proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act 1960 where the statutory route (Form N) is the exclusive method for interested parties to participate; permitting intervention would be an abuse of process.
Court Disposition
Application to intervene dismissed
Orders
- Application dismissed with costs of RM 3,000.00 to each Appellant to be paid by the Applicant, subject to allocator fee
- Same orders apply to DA-15-22-10/2020 and DA-15-23-10/2020
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment