ASIAN REGAL HOLDINGS SDN BHD Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Kuala Selangor
The court held the scheduled lands form part of a contiguous agricultural estate and must be valued as estate land under para 1(2D) First Schedule LAA read with s.214A NLC; applicant failed to establish prima facie entitlement to injurious affection and severance in most claims so those claims were dismissed; the Land Administrator's awards were adjusted for estate valuation resulting in revised market values (RM60.00/sqm for Lots 687–693 and RM50.00/sqm for Lot 15) and specified overpaid amounts, with all other awards maintained and assessor fees ordered paid.
- Citation
- BA-15-89-11/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Landowner / Applicant (lr 88 94) / Second Respondent (lr 261): Asian Regal Holdings Sdn Bhd; Respondent / Land Administrator: Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Kuala Selangor; Applicant / Concessionaire (lr 95): West Coast Expressway Sdn Bhd; Applicant (lr 261) / Applying Agent for West Coast Expressway: Lembaga Lebuhraya Malaysia
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 2024
- Case Number
- BA-15-89-11/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Land Reference Under the Land Acquisition Act 1960 (compulsory Acquisition) / Judgment (land Reference Court)
- Outcome
- Landowner’s objections allowed in part (reclassification as estate land and market value adjustments) and otherwise dismissed; overpaid amounts quantified and assessor fees ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Land Acquisition, Compensation, Market Value, Injurious Affection, Severance, Estate Land Valuation, Land Reference Procedure, Role of Assessors
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Asian Regal Holdings Sdn Bhd
Landowner / Applicant (lr 88 94) / Second Respondent (lr 261)
Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Kuala Selangor
Respondent / Land Administrator
West Coast Expressway Sdn Bhd
Applicant / Concessionaire (lr 95)
Lembaga Lebuhraya Malaysia
Applicant (lr 261) / Applying Agent for West Coast Expressway
Procedural Posture
Land Reference Under the Land Acquisition Act 1960 (compulsory Acquisition) / Judgment (land Reference Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the scheduled lots constitute estate land under s.214A National Land Code and para 1(2D) First Schedule LAA; effect on market value assessment
- 2 Whether injurious affection and severance claims are established and compensable
- 3 Whether applicant's valuation established a prima facie case under Third Schedule para 2(1) LAA
Ratio Decidendi
The court held the scheduled lands form part of a contiguous agricultural estate and must be valued as estate land under para 1(2D) First Schedule LAA read with s.214A NLC; applicant failed to establish prima facie entitlement to injurious affection and severance in most claims so those claims were dismissed; the Land Administrator's awards were adjusted for estate valuation resulting in revised market values (RM60.00/sqm for Lots 687–693 and RM50.00/sqm for Lot 15) and specified overpaid amounts, with all other awards maintained and assessor fees ordered paid.
Court Disposition
Landowner’s objections allowed in part (reclassification as estate land and market value adjustments) and otherwise dismissed; overpaid amounts quantified and assessor fees ordered.
Orders
- LR BA-15-88-11/2021 (Lot 693): market value RM60.00 per square metre; overpaid amount RM12300.00; all other claims dismissed; other awards of Land Administrator maintained; deposit returned to applicant; applicant to pay two assessors RM500.00 each within 7 days.
- LR BA-15-89-11/2021 (Lot 692): market value RM60.00 per square metre; overpaid amount RM36600.00; all other claims dismissed; other awards of Land Administrator maintained; deposit returned to applicant; applicant to pay two assessors RM500.00 each within 7 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment