ASIAN REGAL HOLDINGS SDN BHD Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Kuala Selangor
The court held that the scheduled lands qualify as estate land under s.214A NLC and paragraph 1(2D) First Schedule LAA; therefore comparisons and valuation must adopt an estate valuation approach. The Landowner failed to establish a prima facie case for severance and injurious affection because their valuer did not properly support those claims in the valuation report. Consequently the court adjusted market values downward (RM60.00/sqm for the consolidated lots in BA-15-88 to BA-15-95 and RM50.00/sqm for BA-15-261) and maintained other aspects of the Land Administrator's awards, returning deposits and ordering specified overpayment adjustments and assessor payments.
- Citation
- BA-15-90-11/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Landowner / Applicant: Asian Regal Holdings Sdn Bhd; Respondent (land Administrator): Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Kuala Selangor; Concessionaire / Applicant: West Coast Expressway Sdn Bhd; Applicant (applying Agent): Lembaga Lebuhraya Malaysia
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 2024
- Case Number
- BA-15-90-11/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Land Reference Under Land Acquisition Act 1960 / Judgment (final Determination on Compensation)
- Outcome
- Partially allowed in favour of respondent valuations as adjusted for estate classification; Landowner's additional claims for injurious affection, severance and other consequential losses largely dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Land Acquisition, Compensation, Injurious Affection, Severance, Estate Land Valuation, Land Reference Procedure, Role of Assessors
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Asian Regal Holdings Sdn Bhd
Landowner / Applicant
Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Kuala Selangor
Respondent (land Administrator)
West Coast Expressway Sdn Bhd
Concessionaire / Applicant
Lembaga Lebuhraya Malaysia
Applicant (applying Agent)
Procedural Posture
Land Reference Under Land Acquisition Act 1960 / Judgment (final Determination on Compensation)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the scheduled lands qualify as estate land under section 214A National Land Code and paragraph 1(2D) First Schedule LAA
- 2 Proper basis for assessing market value (estate valuation v individual parcel valuation)
- 3 Whether claims for injurious affection and severance are made out
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the scheduled lands qualify as estate land under s.214A NLC and paragraph 1(2D) First Schedule LAA; therefore comparisons and valuation must adopt an estate valuation approach. The Landowner failed to establish a prima facie case for severance and injurious affection because their valuer did not properly support those claims in the valuation report. Consequently the court adjusted market values downward (RM60.00/sqm for the consolidated lots in BA-15-88 to BA-15-95 and RM50.00/sqm for BA-15-261) and maintained other aspects of the Land Administrator's awards, returning deposits and ordering specified overpayment adjustments and assessor payments.
Court Disposition
Partially allowed in favour of respondent valuations as adjusted for estate classification; Landowner's additional claims for injurious affection, severance and other consequential losses largely dismissed
Orders
- BA-15-88-11/2021: market value fixed at RM60.00 per square metre; overpaid amount RM12300.00; other claims dismissed; deposit returned to applicant; applicant to pay the two assessors RM500.00 each within 7 days
- BA-15-89-11/2021: market value fixed at RM60.00 per square metre; overpaid amount RM36600.00; other claims dismissed; deposit returned to applicant; applicant to pay the two assessors RM500.00 each within 7 days
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment