1. ) RAJA MOHD ZANI BIN RAJA YUSOFF 2. ) RAJA MUHAMMAD FAIZ HAIQAL BIN RAJA MOHD ZAIN Amran Bin Mohd Amin (Seorang Bapa Dan Waris Kadim Yang Sah Dan Sebenar Kepada Muhammad Aqil Irsyad Bin Amran - Simati)
Insufficient credible evidence to determine precise manner of the collision led the court to apportion liability equally between the parties (50% each). The court reduced the general damages for severe traumatic brain injury to RM200,000 (subject to a 40% reduction noted by the court) based on compendium guidance and case law. The respondent's claim for home caregiver costs was allowed in part (RM7,750) despite lack of receipts, on the basis of expert reports and judicial notice of the claimant's bedridden condition and family circumstances. Costs of this appeal were ordered to be borne by the parties themselves and Sessions Court costs to follow the apportioned liability.
- Citation
- DA-12B-35-08/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant (owner): Raja Mohd Zaini bin Raja Yusoff; Appellant (rider): Raja Muhammad Faiz Haiqal bin Raja Mohd Zaini; Respondent (father and Lawful Heir): Amran bin Mohd Amin
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 8 September 2021
- Case Number
- DA-12B-35-08/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (motor Accident / Personal Injury) / High Court Appeal From Sessions Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; cross-appeal allowed in part; Sessions Court judgment set aside insofar as liability and quantum
- Legal Topics
- Liability Apportionment, Quantum of General Damages, Special Damages (caregiver Costs), Costs
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Raja Mohd Zaini bin Raja Yusoff
Appellant (owner)
Raja Muhammad Faiz Haiqal bin Raja Mohd Zaini
Appellant (rider)
Amran bin Mohd Amin
Respondent (father and Lawful Heir)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (motor Accident / Personal Injury) / High Court Appeal From Sessions Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appellants are 100% liable or liability should be apportioned
- 2 Whether the award for severe traumatic brain injury is excessive
- 3 Whether respondent is entitled to special damages for full-time home caregiver costs after discharge
Ratio Decidendi
Insufficient credible evidence to determine precise manner of the collision led the court to apportion liability equally between the parties (50% each). The court reduced the general damages for severe traumatic brain injury to RM200,000 (subject to a 40% reduction noted by the court) based on compendium guidance and case law. The respondent's claim for home caregiver costs was allowed in part (RM7,750) despite lack of receipts, on the basis of expert reports and judicial notice of the claimant's bedridden condition and family circumstances. Costs of this appeal were ordered to be borne by the parties themselves and Sessions Court costs to follow the apportioned liability.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; cross-appeal allowed in part; Sessions Court judgment set aside insofar as liability and quantum
Orders
- Liability apportioned 50% to appellants and 50% to respondent
- General damages for severe traumatic brain injury set at RM200000 (subject to 40% reduction as applied by the court)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment