LIFE PARADISE SDN BHD 1. EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF MALAYSIA BERHAD 2. PENGARAH TANAH DAN GALIAN NEGERI SEMBILAN
Titles were deposited as security for a loan thereby satisfying the preconditions of sections 281 and 330 NLC entitling the respondent to enter lien-holder's caveats; proprietor's express consent was unnecessary where deposit demonstrated intention to secure a loan; section 17 of the Malay Reservations Enactment exempts entities in the Second Schedule (including respondent) so the prohibition in section 10 did not bar creation/registration of the lien and associated caveats; a void third-party charge did not negate the independent statutory lien; therefore the High Court decisions dismissing the appellant's challenge to the caveats and granting order for sale were correct.
- Citation
- 1. N-01(NCVC)(A)-646-11/2019 & W-02(NCVC)(A)-2115-11/2019 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Appellant / Plaintiff: Life Paradise Sdn Bhd; Respondent / Plaintiff: Export-Import Bank of Malaysia Berhad; Nominal Respondent: Pengarah Tanah Dan Galian Negeri Sembilan
- Court
- NCVC
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 2021
- Case Number
- 1. N-01(NCVC)(A)-646-11/2019 & W-02(NCVC)(A)-2115-11/2019 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (land/lien/caveat and Order for Sale) / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Both appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Lien Holder's Caveat, Section 281 National Land Code, Malay Reservations Enactment Sections 10 and 17, Order for Sale Under Section 281, Third Party Charge, Statutory Lien
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Life Paradise Sdn Bhd
Appellant / Plaintiff
Export-Import Bank of Malaysia Berhad
Respondent / Plaintiff
Pengarah Tanah Dan Galian Negeri Sembilan
Nominal Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (land/lien/caveat and Order for Sale) / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether respondent had the right under section 281 and 330 of the National Land Code to enter lien-holder's caveats over titles deposited as security without express consent of proprietor
- 2 Whether section 10 of the Malay Reservations Enactment prohibits creation/registration of lien or caveat over Malay holding and whether section 17 provides an applicable exception
- 3 Whether a void third-party charge affects validity of a statutory lien and consequent order for sale
Ratio Decidendi
Titles were deposited as security for a loan thereby satisfying the preconditions of sections 281 and 330 NLC entitling the respondent to enter lien-holder's caveats; proprietor's express consent was unnecessary where deposit demonstrated intention to secure a loan; section 17 of the Malay Reservations Enactment exempts entities in the Second Schedule (including respondent) so the prohibition in section 10 did not bar creation/registration of the lien and associated caveats; a void third-party charge did not negate the independent statutory lien; therefore the High Court decisions dismissing the appellant's challenge to the caveats and granting order for sale were correct.
Court Disposition
Both appeals dismissed
Orders
- Both appeals dismissed with costs of RM10,000 each in favour of the respondent, costs to be subject to payment of allocatur
- Order for sale under section 281 of the National Land Code upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment