PANTAI MEDICAL CENTRE SDN BHD [No. Pendaftaran Perniagaan: 73056-D] FAREED REEZAL BIN ARUND (mnedakwa melalui isteri dan wakil litigasinya, Wan Zafura binti Wan Kassim)
Court accepted Graf as relevant medical literature and fixed the Plaintiff's life expectancy at 16 years (taking Graf median), held the High Court's additional 15% deduction was plain error because contingencies were already factored into the chosen estimate, applied section 28A(2)(d)(ii) Civil Law Act 1956 to fix the multiplier for future loss of earnings at 5.5 years, confirmed RM30,000 per month nominal loss of earnings and confirmed and adjusted multiple heads of damages in accordance with a 16-year life expectancy; awarded trial and appeal costs as stated.
- Citation
- W-02(NCvC)(W)-566-04/2020 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Appellant (appeal 566); Respondent (appeal 572): Pantai Medical Centre Sdn Bhd; Respondent (appeal 566); Appellant (appeal 572); Plaintiff (high Court): Fareed Reezal bin Arund; Defendant (high Court): Dr A Damodaran; Defendant (high Court): Dr N Arunachalam; Defendant (high Court): Dr Venugopal Balchand; Defendant (high Court): Dr Sivakamasundari Ampikalpakan
- Court
- NCvC
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 2 September 2021
- Case Number
- W-02(NCvC)(W)-566-04/2020 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal Medical Negligence (quantum) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Quantum (grounds of Judgment)
- Outcome
- Appeals partly allowed in part and dismissed in part. Court adjusted quantum: fixed life expectancy at 16 years; set multiplier for future earnings at 5.5 years; confirmed and varied multiple heads of damages per judgment; awarded costs.
- Legal Topics
- Life Expectancy Assessment, Multiplier for Future Loss, Contingency Deductions, Loss of Earnings, Special Damages, Cost and Value of Care, Proof of Earnings, Costs
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pantai Medical Centre Sdn Bhd
Appellant (appeal 566); Respondent (appeal 572)
Fareed Reezal bin Arund
Respondent (appeal 566); Appellant (appeal 572); Plaintiff (high Court)
Dr A Damodaran
Defendant (high Court)
Dr N Arunachalam
Defendant (high Court)
Dr Venugopal Balchand
Defendant (high Court)
Dr Sivakamasundari Ampikalpakan
Defendant (high Court)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal Medical Negligence (quantum) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Quantum (grounds of Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate life expectancy for a patient in Persistent Vegetative State (PVS)
- 2 Admissibility and relevance of Graf and Zasler medical studies
- 3 Whether a further judicial deduction (15%) for contingencies is permissible after choosing a conservative life expectancy
Ratio Decidendi
Court accepted Graf as relevant medical literature and fixed the Plaintiff's life expectancy at 16 years (taking Graf median), held the High Court's additional 15% deduction was plain error because contingencies were already factored into the chosen estimate, applied section 28A(2)(d)(ii) Civil Law Act 1956 to fix the multiplier for future loss of earnings at 5.5 years, confirmed RM30,000 per month nominal loss of earnings and confirmed and adjusted multiple heads of damages in accordance with a 16-year life expectancy; awarded trial and appeal costs as stated.
Court Disposition
Appeals partly allowed in part and dismissed in part. Court adjusted quantum: fixed life expectancy at 16 years; set multiplier for future earnings at 5.5 years; confirmed and varied multiple heads of damages per judgment; awarded costs.
Orders
- Set aside High Court’s 15% contingency deduction; life expectancy fixed at 16 years
- Apply multiplier of 5.5 years for future loss of earnings under s.28A(2)(d)(ii) Civil Law Act 1956
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment