Navamalar for the Applicant Joint Liquidator [Messrs Anad & Noraini] Mong Chun Seng and Chia Oh Sheng for RHB Bank Berhad [Messrs Lee Hishamuddin, Allen & Gledhill]
No concluded binding fee agreement existed between the applicant and the chargee bank; charged property is subject to the secured creditor's rights and not company assets; accordingly the applicant is not entitled to draw remuneration or costs from proceeds of sale until the secured debt is fully paid and only then from any surplus; the court has jurisdiction to determine a reasonable remuneration to be taxed and payable from any such surplus; the applicant is released as joint liquidator and must tender bills for full taxation.
- Citation
- POST WINDING UP NO. WA-28PW-446-11/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Applicant Joint Liquidator: Datuk Duar Tuan Kiat; Company (in Liquidation): Sineo Enterprise Sdn Bhd (In Liquidation); Chargee Bank / Respondent: RHB Bank Berhad
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 10 June 2021
- Case Number
- POST WINDING UP NO. WA-28PW-446-11/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Winding Up / Post Winding Up / Notice of Motion for Release of Liquidator and Taxation of Fees
- Outcome
- Motion partly allowed: applicant released as joint liquidator; remuneration and costs to be taxed and payable only from surplus proceeds of charged assets after secured debts are fully settled; certain prayers dismissed; costs awarded against applicant
- Legal Topics
- Liquidator Release, Liquidator Remuneration, Priority of Secured Creditors, Taxation of Costs, Charged Assets and Foreclosure
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Datuk Duar Tuan Kiat
Applicant Joint Liquidator
Sineo Enterprise Sdn Bhd (In Liquidation)
Company (in Liquidation)
RHB Bank Berhad
Chargee Bank / Respondent
Procedural Posture
Winding Up / Post Winding Up / Notice of Motion for Release of Liquidator and Taxation of Fees
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant liquidator is entitled to remuneration and costs from proceeds of charged assets prior to satisfaction of secured creditor's debt
- 2 Whether there was a concluded fee agreement between the liquidator and the chargee bank
- 3 Whether the court can determine and award liquidator's fees where no agreement exists
Ratio Decidendi
No concluded binding fee agreement existed between the applicant and the chargee bank; charged property is subject to the secured creditor's rights and not company assets; accordingly the applicant is not entitled to draw remuneration or costs from proceeds of sale until the secured debt is fully paid and only then from any surplus; the court has jurisdiction to determine a reasonable remuneration to be taxed and payable from any such surplus; the applicant is released as joint liquidator and must tender bills for full taxation.
Court Disposition
Motion partly allowed: applicant released as joint liquidator; remuneration and costs to be taxed and payable only from surplus proceeds of charged assets after secured debts are fully settled; certain prayers dismissed; costs awarded against applicant
Orders
- Applicant released forthwith as one of the joint liquidators of Sineo Enterprise Sdn Bhd
- Dispense with separate meetings of creditors and contributories to consider resignation
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment