Khor Yong Yong (Liquidator Of Shigen Polycolor Sdn. Bhd. (In Liquidation) [Company No: 200101031179 (566938-x)] 1. ) TAN KHENG GUAN 2. ) CHU KOK KHING 3. ) EE GENG CHOON
Where a court-appointed liquidator has performed liquidation duties while his appointment was in effect he is entitled to fair and reasonable remuneration and reimbursement of expenses for that period even if the winding up order is later set aside; professionals appointed by the liquidator may be paid as part of those expenses; liability to pay is imposed on the losing party in the underlying winding up petition (shareholder who loses), not the company.
- Citation
- PA-28PW-30-08/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Applicant (liquidator): Khor Yong Yong; 1st Respondent (petitioner): Tan Kheng Guan; 2nd Respondent: Chu Kok Khing; 3rd Respondent: Ee Geng Choon
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 20 January 2025
- Case Number
- PA-28PW-30-08/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Liquidator's Remuneration Application Following Setting Aside of Winding Up Order / Judgment on Liquidator's Application for Remuneration
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part. Liquidator's fees and expenses and solicitors' professional fees ordered to be paid by the losing party in Petition PA-28NCC-42-05/2022; costs awarded to solicitors as specified; alternative sharing if petition withdrawn or settled.
- Legal Topics
- Liquidator Remuneration, Winding Up, Setting Aside Winding Up Order, Priority of Payments, Costs Orders
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Khor Yong Yong
Applicant (liquidator)
Tan Kheng Guan
1st Respondent (petitioner)
Chu Kok Khing
2nd Respondent
Ee Geng Choon
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Liquidator's Remuneration Application Following Setting Aside of Winding Up Order / Judgment on Liquidator's Application for Remuneration
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a court-appointed liquidator is entitled to remuneration for work performed while appointment was in effect even if the winding up order is later set aside
- 2 Who is liable to pay the liquidator's remuneration and expenses and the fees of professionals appointed by the liquidator
- 3 Whether company funds should be used to meet costs arising from a shareholders' dispute
Ratio Decidendi
Where a court-appointed liquidator has performed liquidation duties while his appointment was in effect he is entitled to fair and reasonable remuneration and reimbursement of expenses for that period even if the winding up order is later set aside; professionals appointed by the liquidator may be paid as part of those expenses; liability to pay is imposed on the losing party in the underlying winding up petition (shareholder who loses), not the company.
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part. Liquidator's fees and expenses and solicitors' professional fees ordered to be paid by the losing party in Petition PA-28NCC-42-05/2022; costs awarded to solicitors as specified; alternative sharing if petition withdrawn or settled.
Orders
- Order that the losing party in Petition No. PA-28NCC-42-05/2022 pay to the liquidator Khor Yong Yong the sum of RM54,873.51 within one month from the date the winding up Court determines Petition 42
- Order that the losing party in Petition No. PA-28NCC-42-05/2022 pay to Messrs. Cheng, Lee & Goh the sum of RM10,000 (professional fees and disbursements) within one month from the date the winding up Court determines Petition 42
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment