[ ] 1. ) KHANTAN A/L NAMASIVAYAM 2. ) LOGAN A/L NAMASIVAYAM 3. ) XXXX 4. ) NAGARAJAN A/L ALAGASAN 5. ) DINESWARAN A/L SIVALINGAM
Court found prosecution proved identity, causation (post-mortem: severe head injuries from blunt force), and that injuries were inflicted by the accused as narrated by credible eyewitness PW16; the bodily injuries were sufficient in the ordinary course to cause death satisfying s300(c); evidence of joint and concerted acts and failure to prevent lethal conduct established common intention under s34; alibi defences of several accused were inadmissible for failure to comply with s402A CPC; on that basis prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt and conviction under s302 read with s34 was justified.
- Citation
- WA-45B-26-02/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Prosecution: Public Prosecutor; Accused: KHANTAN A/L NAMASIVAYAM; Accused: LOGAN A/L NAMASIVAYAM; Accused: VIKNESWARAN A/L KALIMUTHU; Accused: NAGARAJAN A/L ALAGASAN; Accused: DINESWARAN A/L SIVALINGAM
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 3 March 2022
- Case Number
- WA-45B-26-02/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Murder (section 302 Penal Code) / Judgment Conviction and Sentencing
- Outcome
- Convicted and sentenced to death
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Common Intention, Culpable Homicide S300(c), Section 302 Penal Code, Section 34 Penal Code, Alibi Notice S402 a CPC, Evidence and Witness Credibility, Forensic Audio Video Evidence
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Public Prosecutor
Prosecution
KHANTAN A/L NAMASIVAYAM
Accused
LOGAN A/L NAMASIVAYAM
Accused
VIKNESWARAN A/L KALIMUTHU
Accused
NAGARAJAN A/L ALAGASAN
Accused
DINESWARAN A/L SIVALINGAM
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Murder (section 302 Penal Code) / Judgment Conviction and Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Identity of deceased
- 2 Causation between injuries and death
- 3 Whether injuries were inflicted by accused
Ratio Decidendi
Court found prosecution proved identity, causation (post-mortem: severe head injuries from blunt force), and that injuries were inflicted by the accused as narrated by credible eyewitness PW16; the bodily injuries were sufficient in the ordinary course to cause death satisfying s300(c); evidence of joint and concerted acts and failure to prevent lethal conduct established common intention under s34; alibi defences of several accused were inadmissible for failure to comply with s402A CPC; on that basis prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt and conviction under s302 read with s34 was justified.
Court Disposition
Convicted and sentenced to death
Orders
- Convicted of murder under section 302 read with section 34 Penal Code
- Sentenced to death by hanging (mandatory)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment