[ ] 1. ) DEVARAJAN PILLAI A/L MANIKAM 2. ) SARINDRAN A/L GANESAN 3. ) Magindran A/l Sukumaran
Court accepted s27 discovery information from OKT1 as leading to distinct discoveries (body, clothing, weapons, motorcycle) and found identity of deceased proven by circumstantial evidence despite inconclusive DNA; forensic opinion supported that death occurred before body entered water and injuries could be caused by recovered blunt instruments; cumulative circumstantial evidence satisfied standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt that OKT1 caused death and acted with requisite mens rea for murder (s302 Penal Code), while evidence did not prove beyond reasonable doubt that OKT2, OKT3 and OKT4 inflicted fatal injuries but did prove they knowingly assisted to conceal evidence and mislead...
- Citation
- CB-45B-7-11/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Prosecution: Pendakwa Raya; Accused (okt1): Devarajan Pillai a/l Manikam; Accused (okt2): Sarindran a/l Ganesan; Accused (okt3): Magindran a/l Sukumaran; Accused (okt4): Shangkaran Pillai a/l Manikam
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2023
- Case Number
- CB-45B-7-11/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Murder Trial / Judgment and Sentencing
- Outcome
- OKT1 (Devarajan Pillai a/l Manikam) convicted of murder under s302 Penal Code and sentenced to death; OKT2 (Sarindran a/l Ganesan), OKT3 (Magindran a/l Sukumaran) and OKT4 (Shangkaran Pillai a/l Manikam) acquitted of s302 but convicted under s201 Penal Code and each sentenced to 6 years' imprisonment from date of...
- Legal Topics
- Murder (s302 Penal Code), Common Intention (s34 Penal Code), Admissibility of Discovery Statements (s27 Evidence Act 1950), Circumstantial Evidence, Concealment/destroying Evidence (s201 Penal Code), Identification and DNA Evidence, Court Procedure for Multiple Accused
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pendakwa Raya
Prosecution
Devarajan Pillai a/l Manikam
Accused (okt1)
Sarindran a/l Ganesan
Accused (okt2)
Magindran a/l Sukumaran
Accused (okt3)
Shangkaran Pillai a/l Manikam
Accused (okt4)
Procedural Posture
Criminal Murder Trial / Judgment and Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether prosecution proved elements of murder beyond reasonable doubt
- 2 Whether information from OKT1 admissible under section 27 Evidence Act 1950
- 3 Whether prosecution proved common intention under section 34 Penal Code as to OKT1-OKT4
Ratio Decidendi
Court accepted s27 discovery information from OKT1 as leading to distinct discoveries (body, clothing, weapons, motorcycle) and found identity of deceased proven by circumstantial evidence despite inconclusive DNA; forensic opinion supported that death occurred before body entered water and injuries could be caused by recovered blunt instruments; cumulative circumstantial evidence satisfied standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt that OKT1 caused death and acted with requisite mens rea for murder (s302 Penal Code), while evidence did not prove beyond reasonable doubt that OKT2, OKT3 and OKT4 inflicted fatal injuries but did prove they knowingly assisted to conceal evidence and mislead...
Court Disposition
OKT1 (Devarajan Pillai a/l Manikam) convicted of murder under s302 Penal Code and sentenced to death; OKT2 (Sarindran a/l Ganesan), OKT3 (Magindran a/l Sukumaran) and OKT4 (Shangkaran Pillai a/l Manikam) acquitted of s302 but convicted under s201 Penal Code and each sentenced to 6 years' imprisonment from date of...
Orders
- Convict OKT1 of offence under section 302 Penal Code; sentence: death by hanging.
- Convict OKT2, OKT3 and OKT4 of offence under section 201 Penal Code; sentence: imprisonment for 6 years each from date of arrest.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment