[ ] 1. ) DEVARAJAN PILLAI A/L MANIKAM 2. ) SARINDRAN A/L GANESAN 3. ) Magindran A/l Sukumaran

[ ] 1. ) DEVARAJAN PILLAI A/L MANIKAM 2. ) SARINDRAN A/L GANESAN 3. ) Magindran A/l Sukumaran

Court accepted s27 discovery information from OKT1 as leading to distinct discoveries (body, clothing, weapons, motorcycle) and found identity of deceased proven by circumstantial evidence despite inconclusive DNA; forensic opinion supported that death occurred before body entered water and injuries could be caused by recovered blunt instruments; cumulative circumstantial evidence satisfied standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt that OKT1 caused death and acted with requisite mens rea for murder (s302 Penal Code), while evidence did not prove beyond reasonable doubt that OKT2, OKT3 and OKT4 inflicted fatal injuries but did prove they knowingly assisted to conceal evidence and mislead...

Citation
CB-45B-7-11/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Parties
Prosecution: Pendakwa Raya; Accused (okt1): Devarajan Pillai a/l Manikam; Accused (okt2): Sarindran a/l Ganesan; Accused (okt3): Magindran a/l Sukumaran; Accused (okt4): Shangkaran Pillai a/l Manikam
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
12 May 2023
Case Number
CB-45B-7-11/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Procedural Posture
Criminal Murder Trial / Judgment and Sentencing
Outcome
OKT1 (Devarajan Pillai a/l Manikam) convicted of murder under s302 Penal Code and sentenced to death; OKT2 (Sarindran a/l Ganesan), OKT3 (Magindran a/l Sukumaran) and OKT4 (Shangkaran Pillai a/l Manikam) acquitted of s302 but convicted under s201 Penal Code and each sentenced to 6 years' imprisonment from date of...
Legal Topics
Murder (s302 Penal Code), Common Intention (s34 Penal Code), Admissibility of Discovery Statements (s27 Evidence Act 1950), Circumstantial Evidence, Concealment/destroying Evidence (s201 Penal Code), Identification and DNA Evidence, Court Procedure for Multiple Accused
Source Language
Malay/English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pendakwa Raya

Prosecution

Devarajan Pillai a/l Manikam

Accused (okt1)

Sarindran a/l Ganesan

Accused (okt2)

Magindran a/l Sukumaran

Accused (okt3)

Shangkaran Pillai a/l Manikam

Accused (okt4)

Procedural Posture

Criminal Murder Trial / Judgment and Sentencing

  1. 1 Whether prosecution proved elements of murder beyond reasonable doubt
  2. 2 Whether information from OKT1 admissible under section 27 Evidence Act 1950
  3. 3 Whether prosecution proved common intention under section 34 Penal Code as to OKT1-OKT4

Ratio Decidendi

Court accepted s27 discovery information from OKT1 as leading to distinct discoveries (body, clothing, weapons, motorcycle) and found identity of deceased proven by circumstantial evidence despite inconclusive DNA; forensic opinion supported that death occurred before body entered water and injuries could be caused by recovered blunt instruments; cumulative circumstantial evidence satisfied standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt that OKT1 caused death and acted with requisite mens rea for murder (s302 Penal Code), while evidence did not prove beyond reasonable doubt that OKT2, OKT3 and OKT4 inflicted fatal injuries but did prove they knowingly assisted to conceal evidence and mislead...

Court Disposition

OKT1 (Devarajan Pillai a/l Manikam) convicted of murder under s302 Penal Code and sentenced to death; OKT2 (Sarindran a/l Ganesan), OKT3 (Magindran a/l Sukumaran) and OKT4 (Shangkaran Pillai a/l Manikam) acquitted of s302 but convicted under s201 Penal Code and each sentenced to 6 years' imprisonment from date of...

Orders

  • Convict OKT1 of offence under section 302 Penal Code; sentence: death by hanging.
  • Convict OKT2, OKT3 and OKT4 of offence under section 201 Penal Code; sentence: imprisonment for 6 years each from date of arrest.